0
00:00:03,870 --> 00:00:11,160
Jorge Pullin: Okay, so it's bigger than this Marcin keselowski who will speak about a new approach to homogeneous isotopic sector quantum gravity.

1
00:00:12,150 --> 00:00:13,440
Marcin Kisielowski: Thank you, thank you.

2
00:00:14,250 --> 00:00:30,750
Marcin Kisielowski: In my today's talk i'll talk about my my paper from 2020 where I propose the new approach to studying extracting homogeneous is a Tropic sector of quantum gravity.

3
00:00:32,340 --> 00:00:40,440
Marcin Kisielowski: Let me start with a brief motivation and my motivation comes basically from the two papers.

4
00:00:41,850 --> 00:00:58,980
Marcin Kisielowski: Were promising candidates for the models of quantum gravity have been proposed in the canonical quantum gravity one is a model of quantum gravity coupled to rotational dust and the second one is about quantum gravity coupled to.

5
00:01:00,030 --> 00:01:02,340
Marcin Kisielowski: Muslim scholar field and.

6
00:01:03,420 --> 00:01:04,830
Marcin Kisielowski: My motivation is.

7
00:01:06,150 --> 00:01:13,440
Marcin Kisielowski: I think well described by the following quote from one of the papers, with a.

8
00:01:14,640 --> 00:01:17,100
Marcin Kisielowski: Strong title gravity enticed.

9
00:01:18,870 --> 00:01:24,990
Marcin Kisielowski: In in the loop quantum cosmology models of the homogeneous mass the scholar field coupled to gravity.

10
00:01:25,440 --> 00:01:32,400
Marcin Kisielowski: Big Bang turnouts turns out to be replaced by a big bands, as a result of the quantum gravity affects now.

11
00:01:32,820 --> 00:01:39,960
Marcin Kisielowski: With our model we can consider the same system of fields, from the point of view of a default theory without the symmetry reduction.

12
00:01:40,410 --> 00:01:53,460
Marcin Kisielowski: Similarly, we can also consider the quantum gravitational collapse quantum black holes and theory entropy all those cases are manageable within our model and the only difficulties of a technical nature.

13
00:01:54,540 --> 00:01:54,960
Marcin Kisielowski: and

14
00:01:56,670 --> 00:02:14,130
Marcin Kisielowski: So I wanted to talk today about this technical nature, simplifying this technical problems which arise when we when we try to study the symmetry reduced systems in the full theory.

15
00:02:15,330 --> 00:02:26,340
Marcin Kisielowski: I I focus on on homogeneous is a Tropic sector, but I believe my ideas can be applied to also.

16
00:02:27,450 --> 00:02:30,090
Marcin Kisielowski: quantum black holes and.

17
00:02:31,440 --> 00:02:32,850
Marcin Kisielowski: what's the difficulty.

18
00:02:34,200 --> 00:02:39,330
Marcin Kisielowski: In those two models, the matter fields play they're all of.

19
00:02:40,560 --> 00:02:49,680
Marcin Kisielowski: dynamically coupled observer with respect to which the dynamics happens and the dynamics is formulated and then.

20
00:02:51,360 --> 00:02:55,260
Marcin Kisielowski: add a panorama authorization technique is used to map.

21
00:02:56,640 --> 00:03:06,270
Marcin Kisielowski: Fully constraints system to system with a true non vanishing hamiltonian and, in fact, what is.

22
00:03:07,890 --> 00:03:16,980
Marcin Kisielowski: What needs to be calculated is an evolution operator and I view this problem as a diagonal ization problem.

23
00:03:20,190 --> 00:03:25,710
Marcin Kisielowski: Therefore, I will focus on the on the on the problem of day they're gonna lies in.

24
00:03:27,210 --> 00:03:31,530
Marcin Kisielowski: The operators and I wanted to talk about.

25
00:03:33,360 --> 00:03:39,240
Marcin Kisielowski: Symmetry reduction today as kind of technical tool at the quantum level.

26
00:03:40,680 --> 00:03:45,450
Marcin Kisielowski: which can be used to simplify the problem.

27
00:03:47,730 --> 00:04:00,150
Marcin Kisielowski: And I will focus on a class of physical hamiltonian so which, for me, seem to be technically simpler aware by technically, I mean.

28
00:04:01,650 --> 00:04:12,030
Marcin Kisielowski: When when when you want to diagonal is some mattresses after introducing some kind of on a computer.

29
00:04:13,170 --> 00:04:17,850
Marcin Kisielowski: It seems to me that this class of hamiltonian of this.

30
00:04:20,010 --> 00:04:21,690
Marcin Kisielowski: is best for start.

31
00:04:27,030 --> 00:04:37,620
Marcin Kisielowski: After after this short motivation i'll go to symmetric states on the lattice I think my ideas are best described by studying.

32
00:04:38,940 --> 00:04:49,980
Marcin Kisielowski: A case of a cubic lattice i'll consider this cubic lattice on a three terrorists to make to make it more regular.

33
00:04:51,120 --> 00:04:51,870
Marcin Kisielowski: Then.

34
00:04:53,100 --> 00:05:11,730
Marcin Kisielowski: I will pass to symmetric states on the lattice with loops it's because there's color constraint operator and physical hamiltonian is a function of his color is constrained operator and add and subtract loops.

35
00:05:13,620 --> 00:05:19,080
Marcin Kisielowski: These loops are tangential to do two different links and.

36
00:05:20,670 --> 00:05:34,860
Marcin Kisielowski: In fact, I will focus on in various spaces of this operator in various spaces, which in my opinion can be considered to be homogeneous isotopic.

37
00:05:36,120 --> 00:05:53,190
Marcin Kisielowski: This scholar comes the southern conference spaces is is important is useful in the diagonal ization problem, because you can restrict this operator to the environment, space in particular and eigenvector is an element of.

38
00:05:54,360 --> 00:05:57,060
Marcin Kisielowski: of an off some invariance space.

39
00:05:59,820 --> 00:06:04,920
Marcin Kisielowski: We this operator is defined on the vertex kilobits a space.

40
00:06:06,090 --> 00:06:07,590
Marcin Kisielowski: which I will introduce.

41
00:06:08,700 --> 00:06:10,710
Marcin Kisielowski: In the third section.

42
00:06:13,020 --> 00:06:27,060
Marcin Kisielowski: that's why I chose this ordering first i'll introduce the hilbert space, then the operator and then the metrics stage homogeneous is a Tropic states on a lattice with loops and, at the end i'll summarize.

43
00:06:30,600 --> 00:06:36,870
Marcin Kisielowski: As I said, I consider the spaceman default to be the three terrorists.

44
00:06:38,220 --> 00:06:55,440
Marcin Kisielowski: And the three terrorists are, if you as a caution space, I take our three and quotient it by the group subgroup of the group of translations this sub group is labeled by a parameter real parameter a real positive parameter a.

45
00:06:56,610 --> 00:07:05,250
Marcin Kisielowski: And it is formed of translations of this for far more P P Q R ar ar integers.

46
00:07:07,680 --> 00:07:14,040
Marcin Kisielowski: So this three terrorists can be viewed, for example as as a cube.

47
00:07:15,900 --> 00:07:28,590
Marcin Kisielowski: let's have a look at the the biggest cube here in this picture, with appropriate faces I identified so the Left face and the right face that up and bottom and the front and back.

48
00:07:29,820 --> 00:07:30,300
Marcin Kisielowski: Now.

49
00:07:31,680 --> 00:07:34,050
Marcin Kisielowski: we introduce a lattice.

50
00:07:36,030 --> 00:07:43,440
Marcin Kisielowski: here on this picture we either pick that a lattice where I take this epsilon equal one half.

51
00:07:46,170 --> 00:07:51,180
Marcin Kisielowski: So I split each segment of the lightest into two parts.

52
00:07:52,950 --> 00:08:04,890
Marcin Kisielowski: And when we quotient, so this is a part of our three, but this lattice can be extended to how are three when we questioned it and we obtain a lattice on a three tours.

53
00:08:07,590 --> 00:08:11,190
Marcin Kisielowski: And this lattice as a symmetry grew up.

54
00:08:12,390 --> 00:08:25,680
Marcin Kisielowski: This symmetry group is a semi direct product of have finished subgroup of a group of rotations, this is a group of orientation preserving symmetries of acute.

55
00:08:27,360 --> 00:08:40,530
Marcin Kisielowski: And times kind of translations, but this translations are in a sense, cyclic they are adjusted to the terrorists, so we consider translations in our three and question did.

56
00:08:41,640 --> 00:08:44,220
Marcin Kisielowski: To get translations on at RS.

57
00:08:48,420 --> 00:08:56,400
Marcin Kisielowski: Now, an important concept is what I call homogeneous is a Tropic spin network.

58
00:08:59,040 --> 00:09:10,200
Marcin Kisielowski: So I call a spin at work homogeneous is a Tropic if it has the furrowing transformation property with respect to the default morpheus.

59
00:09:11,310 --> 00:09:18,510
Marcin Kisielowski: corresponding to the symmetry of the lattice so when acting on the spin network it.

60
00:09:19,620 --> 00:09:26,340
Marcin Kisielowski: It leaves this state invariant possibly changing the face of the way function.

61
00:09:27,420 --> 00:09:33,600
Marcin Kisielowski: And I will assume that this face is one dimensional unitary representation of.

62
00:09:34,710 --> 00:09:35,670
Marcin Kisielowski: The symmetry group.

63
00:09:39,330 --> 00:09:50,580
Marcin Kisielowski: Far homogeneous is the tropics been networks in follows in particular that all spins are set to be equal to some number J.

64
00:09:52,410 --> 00:09:56,280
Marcin Kisielowski: So this is a kind of assumption.

65
00:09:58,860 --> 00:10:03,840
Marcin Kisielowski: starting point as assumption, this is a restriction of the States.

66
00:10:04,920 --> 00:10:11,340
Marcin Kisielowski: We see that it already puts the oldest spins equal to some given spin.

67
00:10:12,480 --> 00:10:14,550
Marcin Kisielowski: But that's not the end of the story.

68
00:10:14,580 --> 00:10:16,440
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Can I just ask a question for the last one.

69
00:10:16,470 --> 00:10:17,190
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes, please.

70
00:10:17,760 --> 00:10:17,940
yeah.

71
00:10:19,470 --> 00:10:24,090
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So the face depends on the state as well fi some s.

72
00:10:25,320 --> 00:10:26,100
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes.

73
00:10:26,340 --> 00:10:32,490
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes, at the end of the day, I will need just dependence on on this number Jay.

74
00:10:33,060 --> 00:10:33,390
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: I say.

75
00:10:35,070 --> 00:10:38,370
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: But, to begin with you're saying that it depends on this allowed to it.

76
00:10:39,810 --> 00:10:44,580
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So it's not a mean yes or something i'm in the sense of if I if I add as well.

77
00:10:45,150 --> 00:10:48,900
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Right okay it's just not a legal representation good.

78
00:10:49,170 --> 00:10:51,960
Yes, yes you're right Thank you.

79
00:10:54,300 --> 00:10:54,780
Marcin Kisielowski: and

80
00:10:55,950 --> 00:11:02,460
Marcin Kisielowski: When you look at the action of the default murphy's miss on on an intertwined.

81
00:11:03,690 --> 00:11:11,730
Marcin Kisielowski: And this default murphy's may have already orientation preserving symmetries of a queue up and.

82
00:11:13,770 --> 00:11:19,050
Marcin Kisielowski: let's look at the links meeting at the origin of our coordinate system.

83
00:11:20,160 --> 00:11:23,400
Marcin Kisielowski: And it permeates the links.

84
00:11:25,140 --> 00:11:34,350
Marcin Kisielowski: And this leads to a permutation of the indices of an entertainer because an index is assigned to Ellen.

85
00:11:36,930 --> 00:11:43,320
Marcin Kisielowski: And I make a projection by appropriate group averaging.

86
00:11:45,060 --> 00:11:45,630
Marcin Kisielowski: Where.

87
00:11:47,430 --> 00:11:58,260
Marcin Kisielowski: I use this face to make the proper dependence, I stated before, and the symmetric states will be the image of this projection operator.

88
00:11:59,460 --> 00:12:09,090
Marcin Kisielowski: and homogeneous is a Tropic spin networks will have all notes labeled with the same intertwine or which is symmetric.

89
00:12:11,310 --> 00:12:13,290
Marcin Kisielowski: This symmetry reduction.

90
00:12:15,120 --> 00:12:21,630
Marcin Kisielowski: is based on this choice of the face honestly speaking first of all, I chose it to be equal to one.

91
00:12:22,770 --> 00:12:25,110
Marcin Kisielowski: But as soon, I discovered that.

92
00:12:26,250 --> 00:12:36,300
Marcin Kisielowski: Although intuitively living spiritually coherent entertainers at first sight, should be in the space, they were not is because of.

93
00:12:37,980 --> 00:12:45,930
Marcin Kisielowski: transformation properties of the paradigm of coherence states with when a rotation is applied, because when you rotate.

94
00:12:47,220 --> 00:12:50,520
Marcin Kisielowski: The state with as you do metrics.

95
00:12:51,630 --> 00:13:10,650
Marcin Kisielowski: it's not the same as rotating the normals with SL three metrics, but there is also a face, so when you multiply the phases in this particular case, you get the following a choice in order to include living speciality coherent intertwined enters.

96
00:13:12,120 --> 00:13:21,150
Marcin Kisielowski: The group of orientation preserving symmetries is a morphic to the group of permutations of the four diagonals of the cube.

97
00:13:22,410 --> 00:13:35,010
Marcin Kisielowski: And so we then out by side, no sign of G the design of the corresponding permutation of as far.

98
00:13:36,090 --> 00:13:45,330
Marcin Kisielowski: And we take the face to be equal sign to the power to Jay and with this choice, there is always.

99
00:13:46,410 --> 00:14:00,510
Marcin Kisielowski: A living spiritually coherent intertwine are in this space and it corresponds to a cube there is actually a second one which corresponds to a cube with the opposite orientation.

100
00:14:01,890 --> 00:14:03,870
Marcin Kisielowski: If you had you chose.

101
00:14:04,890 --> 00:14:14,760
Marcin Kisielowski: The face to be called one year would be a in the art in orthogonal space and you would explode delivery and speciality of your entertainers.

102
00:14:18,630 --> 00:14:26,130
Marcin Kisielowski: let's have a look at the dimension of their reduced space I calculated it up to.

103
00:14:27,570 --> 00:14:32,310
Marcin Kisielowski: spin equal 45 half's.

104
00:14:33,960 --> 00:14:38,340
Marcin Kisielowski: And we see that the two girls polynomial Lee with the spin.

105
00:14:40,470 --> 00:14:50,910
Marcin Kisielowski: At least in the large spin limit another interesting point in the slot is that for J equal to one half the dimension of the space is equal to, and.

106
00:14:52,230 --> 00:15:04,470
Marcin Kisielowski: The tool, leaving speciality coherent intertwined there's I talked here about here are linearly independent and then they span the space.

107
00:15:06,180 --> 00:15:13,530
Marcin Kisielowski: So first been equal to one half the space is completely described by the living, especially for your entertainers.

108
00:15:15,840 --> 00:15:26,880
Marcin Kisielowski: And in order to study how much this cemetery reduction reduces the dimension of the space of impact whiners I I studied.

109
00:15:28,140 --> 00:15:42,990
Marcin Kisielowski: This ratio, which tells us how many times there's the symmetric space, the space of homogeneous is a Tropic intertwined nurse is smaller than the full space.

110
00:15:44,100 --> 00:15:49,200
Marcin Kisielowski: We see that, with increasing spin this reduction right gross.

111
00:15:50,940 --> 00:15:51,390
Marcin Kisielowski: and

112
00:15:53,940 --> 00:15:54,210
Marcin Kisielowski: and

113
00:15:55,830 --> 00:15:56,520
Marcin Kisielowski: I believe.

114
00:15:57,540 --> 00:16:04,380
Marcin Kisielowski: There is a chance that it stabilizes at the devalue 24 I calculated only up to such spins because.

115
00:16:06,930 --> 00:16:11,820
Marcin Kisielowski: I did calculation on a single note of it, of the computer cluster and.

116
00:16:13,170 --> 00:16:17,850
Marcin Kisielowski: This is how far I could get in in in a week or two.

117
00:16:19,890 --> 00:16:25,230
Marcin Kisielowski: But this is not this, this was not the focus of my research, so I didn't.

118
00:16:26,280 --> 00:16:28,110
Marcin Kisielowski: See what's happening later.

119
00:16:32,160 --> 00:16:35,760
Marcin Kisielowski: Let me now apply this ideas.

120
00:16:38,070 --> 00:16:46,620
Marcin Kisielowski: To the to the scholar constraint operators, first let me recall some definitions of the vertex Gilbert space.

121
00:16:48,150 --> 00:16:49,350
Marcin Kisielowski: And it is.

122
00:16:50,490 --> 00:16:59,640
Marcin Kisielowski: well known here what is kinematic hilbert space of the quantum gravity, it is the akashic completion of the space of cylindrical functions.

123
00:17:01,170 --> 00:17:13,440
Marcin Kisielowski: And the by so gamma I will consider the space of function cylindrical with respect to graph gamma and the advice he tell the gamma it's a cushy completion.

124
00:17:14,580 --> 00:17:20,550
Marcin Kisielowski: The economical hilbert space has an orthogonal the composition.

125
00:17:21,930 --> 00:17:29,280
Marcin Kisielowski: notice that there are no till this here, because you need to consider and not all not all.

126
00:17:30,660 --> 00:17:36,330
Marcin Kisielowski: functions cylindrical with respect to graph gamma but just the proper ones and the.

127
00:17:39,390 --> 00:17:44,400
Marcin Kisielowski: euro can handle proposed such definition is.

128
00:17:46,200 --> 00:17:58,470
Marcin Kisielowski: It that you need to do it because of cylindrical consistency, if you, for example, divide divide a link and then one of the spaces is is the subspace, of the other so.

129
00:17:59,160 --> 00:18:09,900
Marcin Kisielowski: In this, the composition, they will be not orthogonal So this is the proper definition and my and this, this will be the definition of edge camera.

130
00:18:13,320 --> 00:18:13,890
Marcin Kisielowski: Now.

131
00:18:16,980 --> 00:18:28,650
Marcin Kisielowski: Now, in the vertex Gilbert space, one does and are very gene with the respect to the group of different morpheus fixing the notes of the graph gamma that is.

132
00:18:29,850 --> 00:18:52,020
Marcin Kisielowski: Fixing I mean they act three valley on the set of the notes of the graph and this a very drink is like the standard one standard, I mean when you impose a vector constraint just one limits to this sub group this group of the former business fixing the notes of the graph.

133
00:18:53,160 --> 00:18:59,040
Marcin Kisielowski: I will consider only Su to gauge invite or Yun cylindrical functions.

134
00:19:00,600 --> 00:19:11,670
Marcin Kisielowski: And so the vertex Gilbert space in my case will be the kashi completion of the image of the gate of the Su to gauge and variances in the recall functions.

135
00:19:15,480 --> 00:19:15,900
Marcin Kisielowski: This.

136
00:19:17,250 --> 00:19:22,470
Marcin Kisielowski: This space has a composition into orthogonal spaces.

137
00:19:23,820 --> 00:19:45,390
Marcin Kisielowski: And, first let me notice that when two graphs gamma gamma prime I related by the former fees fixing each element in the set of notes of the two graphs, then the images of this spaces are the same, with respect to this leveraging map.

138
00:19:46,530 --> 00:19:50,940
Marcin Kisielowski: So it is justified to introduce a notation where.

139
00:19:52,140 --> 00:20:04,200
Marcin Kisielowski: He got mine, the brackets were examined the brackets is diff equivalence class of graphs with representative camera now this the composition.

140
00:20:06,090 --> 00:20:09,720
Marcin Kisielowski: Of the following form, where the direct some here is.

141
00:20:11,520 --> 00:20:16,320
Marcin Kisielowski: is all very the affinity subsets of.

142
00:20:17,760 --> 00:20:20,280
Marcin Kisielowski: Of the space manifold Sigma.

143
00:20:21,690 --> 00:20:34,740
Marcin Kisielowski: And each of these spaces each other it's basis invariant under the action of the group de de de de forma sufism data trivially understand V.

144
00:20:35,760 --> 00:20:41,220
Marcin Kisielowski: And it has the the compass, the following the composition in terms of the spaces h.

145
00:20:42,240 --> 00:20:47,670
Marcin Kisielowski: gamma in the brackets and I impose the gauss constraint, this is just an addition.

146
00:20:49,260 --> 00:21:01,710
Marcin Kisielowski: And Sam here is over all equivalence classes of graphs which have the and that which notes are precisely the said V.

147
00:21:04,920 --> 00:21:12,780
Marcin Kisielowski: This color constraint is up is defined in this space, and I will assume.

148
00:21:13,800 --> 00:21:18,390
Marcin Kisielowski: Some general properties which coincides.

149
00:21:20,580 --> 00:21:25,080
Marcin Kisielowski: to match extent with their property stated by Hannah and bulik.

150
00:21:26,490 --> 00:21:32,790
Marcin Kisielowski: First of all, following them I assume it is locked out that it has the the this.

151
00:21:34,140 --> 00:21:47,670
Marcin Kisielowski: This following farm, it is a some of the points of the manifold of operators the cx multiplied by values of the labs faction function at the point X.

152
00:21:48,960 --> 00:21:52,380
Marcin Kisielowski: And each operator cx.

153
00:21:53,820 --> 00:22:01,770
Marcin Kisielowski: In their space age V is invariant space of the of the each operator cx and.

154
00:22:02,910 --> 00:22:04,050
Marcin Kisielowski: When X is.

155
00:22:05,100 --> 00:22:10,200
Marcin Kisielowski: Not a point of V then cx vanishes in this space HIV.

156
00:22:12,210 --> 00:22:21,450
Marcin Kisielowski: And I will assume also that each operator cx does not change the interest whiners associated to the notes different from X.

157
00:22:24,600 --> 00:22:33,330
Marcin Kisielowski: Following here, I can assume that it is covariance that it has the following transformation property with respect to all.

158
00:22:34,860 --> 00:22:43,950
Marcin Kisielowski: analytic the former fierceness in particular if the if the former fizzing fix the notes of the graph the this, it will be invariant.

159
00:22:46,800 --> 00:23:05,130
Marcin Kisielowski: And I assume that it has the following splitting where the sum is all very Paris of links and epsilon is zero if the tangent vectors to the links at the at the node X are cleaner cleaner and one other wise.

160
00:23:06,990 --> 00:23:09,120
Marcin Kisielowski: And each of the operators.

161
00:23:11,220 --> 00:23:16,560
Marcin Kisielowski: maps to this page is gamma into the following some where.

162
00:23:18,660 --> 00:23:39,780
Marcin Kisielowski: He gamma is again here and age gamma plus a minus gamma plus is obtained from gamma by adding a lot tangential to links and other prime according to the prescription which i'll show me the scribe and gamma minus is obtained by removing such low.

163
00:23:41,520 --> 00:23:45,120
Marcin Kisielowski: And the operator does not change.

164
00:23:47,700 --> 00:23:52,680
Marcin Kisielowski: The operator source I consider do not change representation labels of links and.

165
00:23:54,870 --> 00:23:59,940
Marcin Kisielowski: Then you Lopes will be labeled with some fixed representation label l.

166
00:24:04,170 --> 00:24:10,980
Marcin Kisielowski: There is one subtle point which, in my presentation is non standard.

167
00:24:12,540 --> 00:24:23,160
Marcin Kisielowski: it's big I choose my non standard approach, because at some point I introduce a cutoff and wants to diagonal is mattresses.

168
00:24:24,450 --> 00:24:24,930
Marcin Kisielowski: and

169
00:24:26,340 --> 00:24:30,090
Marcin Kisielowski: In order to get this mattresses as.

170
00:24:31,110 --> 00:24:32,610
Marcin Kisielowski: Smaller I believe.

171
00:24:35,430 --> 00:24:45,180
Marcin Kisielowski: In order to get this mattresses smaller I use a different regularization from the standard one proposed by Ls yes and use dilemma of skin makinen.

172
00:24:46,770 --> 00:24:50,010
Marcin Kisielowski: In their paper they carefully describe how the new look.

173
00:24:51,060 --> 00:24:54,840
Marcin Kisielowski: added by this color constraint operator is added.

174
00:24:56,490 --> 00:25:01,770
Marcin Kisielowski: This slope is tangential to do different links of the of the graph.

175
00:25:02,820 --> 00:25:03,240
Marcin Kisielowski: and

176
00:25:04,650 --> 00:25:09,990
Marcin Kisielowski: An important concept here is that tangentially the order of links.

177
00:25:12,330 --> 00:25:30,600
Marcin Kisielowski: And I will then out by T ln J the order of tangent Charlotte, you have the link I would think lj and following the outdoors i'll introduce the notation K I J is just equal to the tangent reality order between links ally and the DJ.

178
00:25:31,650 --> 00:25:37,590
Marcin Kisielowski: And the authors introduce the order of tangential ality of the link I.

179
00:25:38,760 --> 00:25:40,080
Marcin Kisielowski: am not an.

180
00:25:41,550 --> 00:25:47,730
Marcin Kisielowski: As them maximal order of tangential quality of this link with any other link.

181
00:25:48,810 --> 00:26:01,710
Marcin Kisielowski: Now, when I look is that, then it has a tangent reality orders, with the links ally and lj equal to K I plus one and kj plus one.

182
00:26:07,200 --> 00:26:07,830
Marcin Kisielowski: In.

183
00:26:08,280 --> 00:26:11,520
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: But I couldn't stop here because I think some of those little bit lucky.

184
00:26:13,170 --> 00:26:20,760
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: I think what would be good to be that even the previous transparency where you are summarized the work of Hanoi Europe.

185
00:26:21,480 --> 00:26:23,280
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So there's a whole bunch of conditions.

186
00:26:23,790 --> 00:26:25,080
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: On the constraint operating.

187
00:26:26,550 --> 00:26:39,000
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: And the question is really are these conditions just motivated because you want to have simple simplify your life in some ways and calc simplify the calculations, or is there some physical.

188
00:26:40,050 --> 00:26:44,850
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: meaning behind this these restrictions there's a place for my first question.

189
00:26:56,790 --> 00:26:57,210
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes.

190
00:26:58,470 --> 00:27:00,240
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Oh, you can just answer this one, then I can.

191
00:27:00,390 --> 00:27:01,230
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: answer that.

192
00:27:01,980 --> 00:27:20,520
Marcin Kisielowski: So I I just gathered some properties of the operators proposed in the in in in the papers which I listed at the beginning, so I kind of summary of of their properties So these are some operators proposed.

193
00:27:22,860 --> 00:27:24,240
Marcin Kisielowski: proposed by.

194
00:27:25,470 --> 00:27:27,120
Marcin Kisielowski: by your leg know.

195
00:27:28,620 --> 00:27:31,710
Marcin Kisielowski: Luca make D and m n O Allah.

196
00:27:32,790 --> 00:27:57,330
Marcin Kisielowski: And, and these are just their common properties, and this is not a kind of isolated as an assumption, but it's actually just a summary of the properties which they have in common, so I don't want to focus on one specific operator from those papers, although I have this.

197
00:27:58,860 --> 00:28:01,500
Marcin Kisielowski: Muslim scholar field case and.

198
00:28:03,450 --> 00:28:09,000
Marcin Kisielowski: From from the paper of Indica make the end and direct.

199
00:28:10,170 --> 00:28:14,880
Marcin Kisielowski: in mind about, but actually the class is a broad there.

200
00:28:15,900 --> 00:28:16,230
Marcin Kisielowski: and

201
00:28:16,590 --> 00:28:24,840
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: I understand that, but mathematically I understand it, and I understand that you're summarizing their work, so the question was just to remind us.

202
00:28:26,040 --> 00:28:28,920
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Whether this restrictions came about.

203
00:28:30,480 --> 00:28:46,530
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: purely for mathematical convenience or was there some kind of physical more reason that you know if you use this constraint operator that dynamic so so nice property like a physical expected property and such such take so that is my first question.

204
00:28:46,560 --> 00:28:46,920
Marcin Kisielowski: To have.

205
00:28:47,670 --> 00:28:49,110
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: What is the motivation behind I mean.

206
00:28:49,170 --> 00:28:50,010
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Just I know it's.

207
00:28:50,070 --> 00:28:51,060
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Just somebody so what.

208
00:28:51,540 --> 00:28:51,960
So.

209
00:28:53,670 --> 00:28:58,380
Marcin Kisielowski: My understanding of this, but maybe the outdoors will be the shed some.

210
00:28:59,700 --> 00:29:02,790
Marcin Kisielowski: Some other lights is that.

211
00:29:05,820 --> 00:29:09,180
Marcin Kisielowski: This operators work well with.

212
00:29:10,920 --> 00:29:11,400
Marcin Kisielowski: With.

213
00:29:12,900 --> 00:29:21,660
Marcin Kisielowski: With with the proposal from the paper of gravity quantization I mentioned as a motivation.

214
00:29:24,600 --> 00:29:25,320
Marcin Kisielowski: Is.

215
00:29:26,760 --> 00:29:27,510
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: OK OK.

216
00:29:30,960 --> 00:29:44,670
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: The next question was that you said that well there's a regularization so what happens if you didn't recognize yoga just a State operate written down up here if I did not realize it then what happens when, why do you need a question.

217
00:29:46,830 --> 00:29:51,870
Marcin Kisielowski: So it's actually yes, I call this slide.

218
00:29:52,950 --> 00:29:55,140
Marcin Kisielowski: regularization but so.

219
00:29:56,190 --> 00:30:03,420
Marcin Kisielowski: But this is actually should be it's about some technical differences in the regularization.

220
00:30:05,340 --> 00:30:20,970
Marcin Kisielowski: I use with from the regularization the outers use and and but as far as I understand the outers regularize the operator with this operator are adds.

221
00:30:23,370 --> 00:30:26,190
Marcin Kisielowski: or subtracts infinitesimally small look.

222
00:30:27,570 --> 00:30:35,790
Marcin Kisielowski: Where on the space of solutions of this vector constraint this infinitesimal parameter drops out.

223
00:30:36,960 --> 00:30:44,700
Marcin Kisielowski: And therefore, it is useful to use this vortex Gilbert space because it's enough to.

224
00:30:46,800 --> 00:30:47,400
Marcin Kisielowski: use.

225
00:30:48,900 --> 00:31:02,670
Marcin Kisielowski: Not the full space of solutions of the vectors constraint, but this one step before where you are very just with respect to the former physical fixing each node often of the graph.

226
00:31:03,900 --> 00:31:13,320
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Right, but why do you like to regularize is the operator, not very defined if you don't quote unquote regular eyes or is a word regularization and little bit of a misnomer, or what.

227
00:31:13,470 --> 00:31:30,780
Marcin Kisielowski: So, my understanding is that the regularization is used to be, because he you take an operator with infinitesimally small look, and so you have this regularization upside down, which controls the coordinate size of the loop and the.

228
00:31:31,980 --> 00:31:32,310
Marcin Kisielowski: and

229
00:31:34,620 --> 00:31:38,250
Marcin Kisielowski: By appropriately choosing this this look.

230
00:31:39,330 --> 00:31:42,120
Marcin Kisielowski: This this regularization parameter.

231
00:31:44,460 --> 00:31:50,910
Marcin Kisielowski: is irrelevant The limit is just a limit of of the same the same numbers.

232
00:31:51,870 --> 00:31:54,870
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So that these loops are not lying in the legacy that you had.

233
00:31:56,190 --> 00:31:57,000
Marcin Kisielowski: They are not.

234
00:31:57,330 --> 00:32:00,180
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: They are not good, so that was the point that are not completely clear to.

235
00:32:00,720 --> 00:32:02,430
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: me okay good okay.

236
00:32:02,940 --> 00:32:07,110
Marcin Kisielowski: Thank you, thank you so i'll draw in a second.

237
00:32:08,880 --> 00:32:12,240
Marcin Kisielowski: Some some loops, so I hope this will become.

238
00:32:13,470 --> 00:32:15,600
Marcin Kisielowski: This will become clear.

239
00:32:20,910 --> 00:32:28,020
Marcin Kisielowski: So I wanted to mention that I use a slightly different regularization and in this regularization I.

240
00:32:29,520 --> 00:32:39,390
Marcin Kisielowski: I choose first I consider so maybe i'll show first how that looks look like, because this was really missing in my transparency.

241
00:32:40,500 --> 00:32:45,030
Marcin Kisielowski: Previously, so I look at it by the scholar constraints operator.

242
00:32:47,130 --> 00:32:50,400
Marcin Kisielowski: Is tangential to two different links of the graph and the.

243
00:32:51,810 --> 00:33:05,580
Marcin Kisielowski: And the size of the loop coordinate size of the loop is not important because you're in the vertex hilbert space and there are different, more systems which can resize resize this loop and.

244
00:33:08,190 --> 00:33:23,280
Marcin Kisielowski: And then they look needs to be checked tangential to two different links of of the graph and it's important How did the order of tangible reality of their look to the graph this is.

245
00:33:24,900 --> 00:33:41,370
Marcin Kisielowski: The, this is the former fees in invariant concept, so this is an information left after the very thing is the the order of tangential ality of this look to to the link and.

246
00:33:41,970 --> 00:33:56,820
Marcin Kisielowski: The differences between the original regularization and my regularization is in what way, to what extent the loop is tangents to to the link and the outers.

247
00:33:59,100 --> 00:34:14,850
Marcin Kisielowski: previously said that you just take the maximal order of tangible reality of the other link with another link and add the new look, is it increases the order by one.

248
00:34:15,990 --> 00:34:16,320
Marcin Kisielowski: and

249
00:34:18,420 --> 00:34:23,460
Marcin Kisielowski: In in my case, it is slightly more complicated still.

250
00:34:24,750 --> 00:34:26,760
Marcin Kisielowski: leads to smaller sub spaces.

251
00:34:28,020 --> 00:34:40,620
Marcin Kisielowski: First, I consider a sub graph of graph gamma formed by links which do not form loops and I, I mean they do not form loops even if you remove the redundant to violent notes.

252
00:34:42,270 --> 00:34:43,890
Marcin Kisielowski: I will call them regular links.

253
00:34:45,660 --> 00:34:51,030
Marcin Kisielowski: And I will make this simplifying assumption, because I focused on the lattice.

254
00:34:54,930 --> 00:35:05,760
Marcin Kisielowski: I will ask him that the regular links are pedophiles non tangential and any look in gamma tangential to precisely two different irregular links.

255
00:35:07,560 --> 00:35:23,700
Marcin Kisielowski: bye Kappa I will denounce the order of the wedge of regular links which is just the maximal order of tangible reality of this look with with any of their links in the wedge.

256
00:35:31,140 --> 00:35:35,970
Marcin Kisielowski: Then I will especial look at it, between the regular links.

257
00:35:39,060 --> 00:35:43,410
Marcin Kisielowski: don't usually the order couple plus one, so it increases.

258
00:35:44,580 --> 00:35:50,850
Marcin Kisielowski: The order of the wedge, and then a loop, which is.

259
00:35:53,970 --> 00:35:58,290
Marcin Kisielowski: that there can be not only regular links in the graph but also loops.

260
00:35:59,430 --> 00:36:08,010
Marcin Kisielowski: And by the conditions I imposed, there is also always a unique pair of regular links to which this look.

261
00:36:08,700 --> 00:36:11,100
Marcin Kisielowski: Is tangent so now, the special.

262
00:36:11,580 --> 00:36:14,700
Marcin Kisielowski: added by the scholar constraint operator.

263
00:36:16,740 --> 00:36:23,850
Marcin Kisielowski: tangent to do this, look alpha coincides with the loop I described previously.

264
00:36:27,120 --> 00:36:27,420
Marcin Kisielowski: and

265
00:36:28,620 --> 00:36:49,410
Marcin Kisielowski: The difference between the two regularization boils down to can be described in this example that consider to sequences first the scholar constraint operator out at a look tangential to one and three than one and and cool and in the other sequence in in another.

266
00:36:51,000 --> 00:37:10,380
Marcin Kisielowski: In another order, then in in my regularization in both cases the sequences leads to the same time generality orders of loops and links and the in the regularization by last year sanusi 11 dusky McKinnon.

267
00:37:11,430 --> 00:37:17,010
Marcin Kisielowski: They lead to different tangent reality orders, so when I introduce a cut off.

268
00:37:18,210 --> 00:37:31,350
Marcin Kisielowski: Then the spaces of the original proposal are bigger than the one I study, but the ideas, if you don't like my regularization for some reason.

269
00:37:31,800 --> 00:37:44,490
Marcin Kisielowski: The ideas go through a while to the original regularization as well, just when you try to calculate something on a computer you try to make the mattresses as as small as possible.

270
00:37:48,060 --> 00:37:48,690
Marcin Kisielowski: What.

271
00:37:49,830 --> 00:38:01,920
Marcin Kisielowski: A he so in in my regularization at the end of the day, what what's important is what I call a loop configuration.

272
00:38:03,390 --> 00:38:03,780
Marcin Kisielowski: At.

273
00:38:05,280 --> 00:38:12,420
Marcin Kisielowski: At a given out and it tells me how many loops are there between link.

274
00:38:13,860 --> 00:38:16,890
Marcin Kisielowski: between a segment of the lattice I and J.

275
00:38:18,900 --> 00:38:19,470
Marcin Kisielowski: Well, I.

276
00:38:20,610 --> 00:38:31,950
Marcin Kisielowski: I use for simplification, I use this condition that the they cannot be that tangent vectors to the links cannot be colina are.

277
00:38:34,800 --> 00:38:39,600
Marcin Kisielowski: It it's because it works faster on the computer and.

278
00:38:41,520 --> 00:38:41,940
Marcin Kisielowski: and

279
00:38:43,440 --> 00:38:52,020
Marcin Kisielowski: I will also so when when you look at the number and I J it tells you that there are.

280
00:38:53,160 --> 00:39:03,180
Marcin Kisielowski: There are this there is this number of loops between link I and J in in in the lattice with loops so gamma l.

281
00:39:04,230 --> 00:39:09,900
Marcin Kisielowski: Is a lattice with loops where the loop configuration is and called it an L and.

282
00:39:11,040 --> 00:39:14,070
Marcin Kisielowski: Allah just gives the number.

283
00:39:15,090 --> 00:39:19,200
Marcin Kisielowski: Of loops that are between the links.

284
00:39:20,820 --> 00:39:24,990
Marcin Kisielowski: I introduce also a total number of loops at the note.

285
00:39:26,190 --> 00:39:26,580
Marcin Kisielowski: and

286
00:39:27,870 --> 00:39:37,950
Marcin Kisielowski: An inquiry on space a space invariant under the action of the scholar constraint operator and looks one of the spaces looks like this.

287
00:39:40,020 --> 00:39:45,240
Marcin Kisielowski: We have direct some are very possible look configurations.

288
00:39:46,320 --> 00:39:53,220
Marcin Kisielowski: And off, and here we have hilbert spaces associated two graphs with a.

289
00:39:54,480 --> 00:40:08,640
Marcin Kisielowski: With a different look configurations, so this is a space we, in our case, this will be a lattice and there will be loops tangential to different links and possibly many loops tangential to.

290
00:40:09,750 --> 00:40:14,820
Marcin Kisielowski: The two different segments, and this is encoded in this expression.

291
00:40:16,590 --> 00:40:29,250
Marcin Kisielowski: This is in very unsafe space because, adding that the the operator adds or subtracts loops so starting from the space it ends in in the space again.

292
00:40:31,710 --> 00:40:43,740
Marcin Kisielowski: And it is convenient in our case on the largest we can think of this space directly in terms of spin networks, the embedded spin networks.

293
00:40:45,870 --> 00:40:51,540
Marcin Kisielowski: And because the embedding is an isometric between between the spaces.

294
00:40:54,060 --> 00:40:56,550
Marcin Kisielowski: And now, so.

295
00:40:57,720 --> 00:41:07,710
Marcin Kisielowski: As I said, use Peter way the composition DRM to make the composition of the space, this is just a standard spin network, the composition.

296
00:41:11,070 --> 00:41:14,370
Marcin Kisielowski: not letting me notice that the inquiry on spaces.

297
00:41:15,510 --> 00:41:36,150
Marcin Kisielowski: Look in the following way So these are just the levels of the segments of the lattice l is the fixed representation label of the look and the loop starts and ends at this note, so there is one index up one index down in this interview in each intertwined.

298
00:41:37,560 --> 00:41:38,100
Marcin Kisielowski: and

299
00:41:41,280 --> 00:41:42,390
Marcin Kisielowski: And and.

300
00:41:44,550 --> 00:41:52,140
Marcin Kisielowski: And now we apply this composition display network, the composition, to our environment space.

301
00:41:54,030 --> 00:41:56,190
Marcin Kisielowski: And we get.

302
00:41:57,660 --> 00:42:19,440
Marcin Kisielowski: In summary, what I said we get this expression, so this is the network, the composition and these are intertwined our spaces here and we have a direct some are very possible look configurations, because the graph we consider different graphs with different configurations of knobs.

303
00:42:20,550 --> 00:42:23,220
Marcin Kisielowski: An important point which can be somehow.

304
00:42:26,970 --> 00:42:38,940
Marcin Kisielowski: and an important step, but it seems trivial, from the point of view of an eyesore murphy's law is that this space is is a morphic further to this space.

305
00:42:40,470 --> 00:42:46,740
Marcin Kisielowski: Just this is an mathematical transformation, but conceptually it leads to something.

306
00:42:48,060 --> 00:43:02,790
Marcin Kisielowski: Different objects before we had just spin that works, and here we have 10s or products over the notes of the lattice of some towers of spaces of invariance sensors.

307
00:43:04,170 --> 00:43:05,520
Marcin Kisielowski: And each.

308
00:43:06,600 --> 00:43:15,450
Marcin Kisielowski: scholar constraint operator at the node and can be viewed as acting in a in a such tower of invariance basis.

309
00:43:16,950 --> 00:43:17,490
Marcin Kisielowski: Therefore.

310
00:43:17,730 --> 00:43:21,420
simone: question but is because it's been several the same right.

311
00:43:23,100 --> 00:43:25,980
simone: No, or you can use with the swap.

312
00:43:27,690 --> 00:43:33,540
Marcin Kisielowski: No, no, sluggish vertex will have an independence been on a link coming out of it.

313
00:43:33,840 --> 00:43:42,090
simone: Then the nearby vertex to each attached don't believe this permutation the general case of plus and times you did.

314
00:43:45,150 --> 00:43:47,910
Marcin Kisielowski: Why the spirits are fixed here.

315
00:43:49,050 --> 00:43:50,670
To be all the same I suppose.

316
00:43:51,870 --> 00:43:56,790
simone: So they don't in this space you don't have operators that can change the spins.

317
00:43:59,040 --> 00:44:01,110
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes, they cannot change the spin.

318
00:44:01,200 --> 00:44:07,050
simone: Okay okay yeah okay good and then another question, so what is the real issue you know.

319
00:44:08,220 --> 00:44:11,610
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: When you said that the same I don't do you mean that they're not all equal.

320
00:44:14,730 --> 00:44:19,380
simone: I meant I meant that they're not looking at operators that can change this pins and because otherwise.

321
00:44:20,430 --> 00:44:23,070
Marcin Kisielowski: yeah uh huh yes, yes, yes, so this is.

322
00:44:24,630 --> 00:44:27,060
Marcin Kisielowski: The just that this construction is adjusted.

323
00:44:28,680 --> 00:44:31,950
Marcin Kisielowski: To this class of operators so.

324
00:44:33,660 --> 00:44:37,020
Marcin Kisielowski: I believe, if you if you can see that.

325
00:44:38,370 --> 00:44:40,050
Marcin Kisielowski: Operators which change the spin.

326
00:44:41,760 --> 00:44:51,000
Marcin Kisielowski: You could, in principle, think of similar construction, I think, but but yes, this construction will not work with, for example, female.

327
00:44:52,140 --> 00:44:54,630
Marcin Kisielowski: scholar constraint operator from algebraic.

328
00:44:55,230 --> 00:44:56,040
Okay.

329
00:44:57,390 --> 00:45:16,380
simone: And I had another clarification these spaces that you're introducing now loop, how do they relate to the initial librispeech to introduce the one of the symmetry reduction, so you you propose a response which was associated with these regular lattice and met the whiners.

330
00:45:16,620 --> 00:45:20,670
simone: Yes, and now, if you are the with a generic operator.

331
00:45:21,330 --> 00:45:22,380
simone: Okay, you said.

332
00:45:22,530 --> 00:45:25,200
simone: he's not gonna change the law is fine.

333
00:45:25,500 --> 00:45:26,970
Marcin Kisielowski: But it will change.

334
00:45:28,680 --> 00:45:30,090
Marcin Kisielowski: You also want to.

335
00:45:30,090 --> 00:45:32,160
simone: pursue this image of the entertainers.

336
00:45:32,910 --> 00:45:43,980
Marcin Kisielowski: So i'll come to this in a few moments, yes, but this is a you catch the important technical problem because first of all I wanted to.

337
00:45:46,290 --> 00:45:51,000
Marcin Kisielowski: which I needed to solve in this project, so first first.

338
00:45:52,140 --> 00:46:06,960
Marcin Kisielowski: I gave you general my first ideas, how the symmetric states should look like, but then the operators, I study they change the graph they are the subtract loops so.

339
00:46:08,520 --> 00:46:23,790
Marcin Kisielowski: So I will show you in a few slides how big how I will consume what what states, I will consider to become a genius eyes, a Tropic on such spaces on such lattice with loops.

340
00:46:26,310 --> 00:46:37,470
Marcin Kisielowski: And and just did this there, they will have the component which has no loops which will coincide with with what I previously described.

341
00:46:39,240 --> 00:46:47,550
Marcin Kisielowski: But the spaces will loops with look differently out the average Inc will move loops and this the states will be.

342
00:46:48,570 --> 00:46:53,310
Marcin Kisielowski: sam's of such states with loops in different positions.

343
00:46:53,700 --> 00:46:54,060
Okay.

344
00:46:55,230 --> 00:46:55,710
simone: Thank you.

345
00:46:56,400 --> 00:46:56,910
Marcin Kisielowski: Thank you.

346
00:47:00,090 --> 00:47:05,790
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes, so this This brings me to what what semana raised.

347
00:47:06,990 --> 00:47:12,420
Marcin Kisielowski: As now consider a lattice lattice with the with loops.

348
00:47:13,470 --> 00:47:14,400
Marcin Kisielowski: First of all.

349
00:47:16,110 --> 00:47:19,710
Marcin Kisielowski: Now we restrict to lattices such that each.

350
00:47:21,480 --> 00:47:28,020
Marcin Kisielowski: So lattice liquid loop will be gamma L and our lattice is just gamma began.

351
00:47:29,550 --> 00:47:32,970
Marcin Kisielowski: So each lattice with loops can contains.

352
00:47:34,080 --> 00:47:40,800
Marcin Kisielowski: Our lattice and we assume that the links of the lattice are labeled with the same same spin J.

353
00:47:42,030 --> 00:47:46,920
Marcin Kisielowski: And the loops are labeled all with spinner some is given spin.

354
00:47:50,520 --> 00:47:56,250
Marcin Kisielowski: Now we still have a default Murphy isms corresponding to.

355
00:47:58,320 --> 00:48:02,820
Marcin Kisielowski: Our group of orientation preserving symmetries of the cube.

356
00:48:05,010 --> 00:48:17,820
Marcin Kisielowski: And as before we can we can make this leveraging but now this operator does not change is not only an intertwined but also.

357
00:48:18,840 --> 00:48:19,320
Marcin Kisielowski: This.

358
00:48:20,550 --> 00:48:22,290
Marcin Kisielowski: Look configuration.

359
00:48:23,490 --> 00:48:24,000
Marcin Kisielowski: So.

360
00:48:25,080 --> 00:48:28,170
Marcin Kisielowski: If there were five links between five labs between.

361
00:48:29,760 --> 00:48:51,360
Marcin Kisielowski: Between link one and toe and you apply a permutation then after acting with after acting with this transformation, you will have five links five loops between different links this will be i'll just tell it precisely in a second and.

362
00:48:52,770 --> 00:48:55,230
Marcin Kisielowski: Here we again have this phase factor.

363
00:48:56,820 --> 00:49:02,670
Marcin Kisielowski: And again, due to the covariance property of this operator.

364
00:49:03,870 --> 00:49:14,850
Marcin Kisielowski: scholar constraint operator it commutes with each of the which each of the default morpheus and therefore it can commute with this projection operator.

365
00:49:16,920 --> 00:49:25,260
Marcin Kisielowski: So now we we look at the image of this projection operator this image is no longer.

366
00:49:26,880 --> 00:49:35,370
Marcin Kisielowski: A single intertwined in a in a single intertwined our space it's in some power of intertwined intertwined.

367
00:49:38,820 --> 00:49:44,160
Marcin Kisielowski: And now we take such a symmetric state and.

368
00:49:45,540 --> 00:49:59,310
Marcin Kisielowski: We multiply we assign this state to each of the nodes of of the lattice and we tend, we tend to multiply we tensor multiplied the same number.

369
00:50:00,450 --> 00:50:06,750
Marcin Kisielowski: The number of times there are not in in the lattice gamma so this way you obtain.

370
00:50:08,160 --> 00:50:09,930
Marcin Kisielowski: You obtain a.

371
00:50:11,010 --> 00:50:16,020
Marcin Kisielowski: kind of homogeneous homogeneous isotopic states.

372
00:50:17,280 --> 00:50:19,560
Marcin Kisielowski: The states will be invariant under the group.

373
00:50:20,580 --> 00:50:20,880
Marcin Kisielowski: Of.

374
00:50:22,320 --> 00:50:26,520
Marcin Kisielowski: Of cemeteries of of the lattice I I talked before.

375
00:50:28,380 --> 00:50:28,800
Marcin Kisielowski: and

376
00:50:31,170 --> 00:50:31,530
Marcin Kisielowski: and

377
00:50:32,550 --> 00:50:43,500
Marcin Kisielowski: So if you, for example, wants to buy a gun allies, the full scholar constraint operator you don't like the diagonal is it at a single node find an Eigen value.

378
00:50:45,450 --> 00:50:47,880
Marcin Kisielowski: Eigen factor added this note and.

379
00:50:49,410 --> 00:50:58,020
Marcin Kisielowski: multiply this the same I I again factor for for each note of of the lattice.

380
00:51:01,110 --> 00:51:21,510
simone: Can you give us an example like you pointed out, these simplest case with the regular Q, but that you are getting in the initial part of your talk now suppose that you act to by just adding a single loop on a pair of links in these six violent vertex.

381
00:51:21,840 --> 00:51:22,230
Yes.

382
00:51:23,280 --> 00:51:37,890
simone: Can you describe it would be the Tower of intertwines Starting from that symmetric one and what would be the resulting in intertwine or after the projection like in a simple example, so that we get some intuition.

383
00:51:39,330 --> 00:51:40,410
Marcin Kisielowski: So, first of all.

384
00:51:42,300 --> 00:51:43,710
Marcin Kisielowski: First of all, you would.

385
00:51:46,680 --> 00:51:49,320
Marcin Kisielowski: yeah first of all, you would add.

386
00:51:51,540 --> 00:51:54,390
Marcin Kisielowski: You would consider.

387
00:51:55,980 --> 00:52:00,120
Marcin Kisielowski: First start with the lattice then add the.

388
00:52:02,280 --> 00:52:06,180
Marcin Kisielowski: then add, for example, one loop between a pair of links.

389
00:52:07,380 --> 00:52:11,550
Marcin Kisielowski: Then you apply this are very aging procedure, which tells you.

390
00:52:12,900 --> 00:52:13,350
Marcin Kisielowski: Why.

391
00:52:17,790 --> 00:52:22,020
Marcin Kisielowski: Which which tells you that you should.

392
00:52:24,210 --> 00:52:24,870
Marcin Kisielowski: You should.

393
00:52:29,460 --> 00:52:35,040
Marcin Kisielowski: One second because i'm thinking about i'm going further and back.

394
00:52:37,590 --> 00:52:38,160
Marcin Kisielowski: Because I.

395
00:52:38,550 --> 00:52:39,540
Marcin Kisielowski: will describe it in.

396
00:52:40,110 --> 00:52:43,950
Marcin Kisielowski: To some extent i'll describe it later, so it will be easier for me to.

397
00:52:44,010 --> 00:52:46,710
Marcin Kisielowski: Talk about the example after two slides.

398
00:52:47,010 --> 00:52:47,340
Okay.

399
00:52:51,390 --> 00:53:00,000
Marcin Kisielowski: So let me just finish finish this one point, and then i'll talk about this example and.

400
00:53:01,590 --> 00:53:13,710
Marcin Kisielowski: First, first of all i'll introduce a cut off in the number of loops so at each note the there will be, I will not allow for more than ella number of loops.

401
00:53:16,320 --> 00:53:18,570
Marcin Kisielowski: scholar constraint operator is.

402
00:53:21,210 --> 00:53:43,110
Marcin Kisielowski: is acting between some is acting in some infinite them dimensional hilbert spaces so after I introduce a cat have to get the metrics which can be a diagonal line on a computer, for example, and this is when you introduce a limitation of a number of loops at each node.

403
00:53:44,250 --> 00:53:44,760
Marcin Kisielowski: And then.

404
00:53:46,740 --> 00:53:47,190
Marcin Kisielowski: Then.

405
00:53:48,630 --> 00:53:54,540
Marcin Kisielowski: Then, then this is one of possible cut offs then.

406
00:53:55,650 --> 00:54:00,630
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Why then face value and the academic scale constraint them because scale because.

407
00:54:00,690 --> 00:54:01,740
Marcin Kisielowski: It is no no.

408
00:54:01,740 --> 00:54:03,180
Marcin Kisielowski: No, no, it is not.

409
00:54:03,390 --> 00:54:10,650
Marcin Kisielowski: It is not this cat have brakes the brakes day invariance just.

410
00:54:14,460 --> 00:54:16,710
Marcin Kisielowski: it's, for example in.

411
00:54:17,760 --> 00:54:25,320
Marcin Kisielowski: I learned that, for example in nuclear physics one introduces a cut off and then.

412
00:54:26,430 --> 00:54:30,150
Marcin Kisielowski: One star studies, Mr three mattresses.

413
00:54:31,320 --> 00:54:40,890
Marcin Kisielowski: After this kind of looks at the Eigen vectors of this matrix and the moves that cut off looks how this.

414
00:54:41,970 --> 00:54:55,560
Marcin Kisielowski: If there are eigenvalues which converts to some value when you move this kind of this is a numerical study and then, if you see that some of the eigenvalues one stabilizes.

415
00:54:56,790 --> 00:54:58,860
Marcin Kisielowski: let's say the lowest or one.

416
00:55:00,750 --> 00:55:02,850
Marcin Kisielowski: or one from the lowest.

417
00:55:04,350 --> 00:55:12,060
Marcin Kisielowski: Then you believe that numerically you have found and eigenvalue and eigenvector.

418
00:55:13,260 --> 00:55:16,020
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: But so that metrics right so here.

419
00:55:16,830 --> 00:55:22,440
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: metaphor, in fact, the scale a constraint is going to map me from edge loops to help us one dupes.

420
00:55:23,550 --> 00:55:24,180
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Then.

421
00:55:25,320 --> 00:55:29,580
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Then, then I don't have a matrix right, so what What do you do we just.

422
00:55:30,090 --> 00:55:36,090
Marcin Kisielowski: So, so in look quantum cosmology, for example, you could introduce a cat of in the volume.

423
00:55:37,740 --> 00:55:42,360
Marcin Kisielowski: And, and then calculate data analyze the matrix on the computer and.

424
00:55:43,830 --> 00:55:48,630
Marcin Kisielowski: And it will turn up turn out that given a cut of in the volume.

425
00:55:49,800 --> 00:55:58,290
Marcin Kisielowski: gives you well estimation of some lowest energy eigenvalues of of the physical hamiltonian.

426
00:55:59,850 --> 00:56:01,530
Marcin Kisielowski: So, because.

427
00:56:02,790 --> 00:56:08,820
Marcin Kisielowski: Because in this Eigen States after this volume there.

428
00:56:10,170 --> 00:56:12,480
Marcin Kisielowski: There isn't really not.

429
00:56:14,280 --> 00:56:31,500
Marcin Kisielowski: Not much happening at larger volumes so for large energies, you could introduce a cut of in the volume and for for low energies, you could take this approximately approximate eigenvalues and obtain.

430
00:56:33,420 --> 00:56:37,860
Marcin Kisielowski: obtain a good approximation of the of the of the full system.

431
00:56:37,980 --> 00:56:42,060
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Right, but here we are interested in the solutions to the hamiltonian constraint right.

432
00:56:42,630 --> 00:56:54,000
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So when we just wanted isn't that what you mean I i'm not sure about I understand what the goal is isn't the goal to find the solutions to the hamiltonian constraint, or something some others something so the goal.

433
00:56:55,260 --> 00:56:56,340
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes.

434
00:56:57,630 --> 00:57:00,270
Marcin Kisielowski: It is that it is.

435
00:57:01,230 --> 00:57:06,750
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: But in presence of some scale up with something not to scale, a field is not included here at the moment.

436
00:57:06,960 --> 00:57:13,380
Marcin Kisielowski: So this killer field works is included in a in this sense that.

437
00:57:14,820 --> 00:57:16,020
Marcin Kisielowski: Once you calculate.

438
00:57:17,400 --> 00:57:22,200
Marcin Kisielowski: Once you calculate an evolution operator, then.

439
00:57:23,310 --> 00:57:23,670
Marcin Kisielowski: Then.

440
00:57:24,930 --> 00:57:27,420
Marcin Kisielowski: Technically, you can construct.

441
00:57:28,920 --> 00:57:32,670
Marcin Kisielowski: You can construct the direct observed bubbles and.

442
00:57:34,140 --> 00:57:37,260
Marcin Kisielowski: Practically you solved the system.

443
00:57:38,820 --> 00:57:41,820
Marcin Kisielowski: So here technical problem is to.

444
00:57:43,020 --> 00:57:44,760
Marcin Kisielowski: The technical problem is to.

445
00:57:46,380 --> 00:57:48,750
Marcin Kisielowski: exponentially eight and operator.

446
00:57:49,260 --> 00:57:50,520
Marcin Kisielowski: Right so.

447
00:57:51,810 --> 00:57:57,540
Marcin Kisielowski: So my idea is, for example, that maybe it will turn out that.

448
00:57:59,190 --> 00:58:04,560
Marcin Kisielowski: When we restrict to this to this sector, we will find some.

449
00:58:05,700 --> 00:58:08,910
Marcin Kisielowski: Eigen vectors which can approximate.

450
00:58:10,770 --> 00:58:12,120
Marcin Kisielowski: which can approximate.

451
00:58:14,010 --> 00:58:14,550
Marcin Kisielowski: The.

452
00:58:15,600 --> 00:58:16,050
Marcin Kisielowski: Full.

453
00:58:18,840 --> 00:58:25,950
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: it's much clearer now okay so you're thinking of this constraint, this only the geometrical part of the constraints, so this will be the.

454
00:58:25,950 --> 00:58:27,240
Marcin Kisielowski: hamiltonian yes.

455
00:58:27,600 --> 00:58:30,480
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: And then the statement is that you're looking for kind of low lying I.

456
00:58:33,330 --> 00:58:34,890
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Just don't understand it okay.

457
00:58:35,010 --> 00:58:36,120
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Now, thank you.

458
00:58:36,270 --> 00:58:37,920
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes, thank you.

459
00:58:39,540 --> 00:58:43,410
Marcin Kisielowski: So i'm coming to see Manas question.

460
00:58:44,460 --> 00:58:56,670
Marcin Kisielowski: And let me first describe how how this, the former fees from from the orientation preserving cemeteries have a cube act.

461
00:58:58,200 --> 00:58:58,560
Marcin Kisielowski: On.

462
00:58:59,820 --> 00:59:08,340
Marcin Kisielowski: In this space in this Tower of spaces, so this Tower has a label which tells us.

463
00:59:09,780 --> 00:59:27,900
Marcin Kisielowski: How many loops there are between links, so we take segment one and and far, for example, and take the number as evaluated at one and four and we get the number five This means there are five loops.

464
00:59:29,490 --> 00:59:35,070
Marcin Kisielowski: And this, the farmer fizzle moves the loops because, for example.

465
00:59:36,240 --> 00:59:49,080
Marcin Kisielowski: Link one and farm is moved to link to and five, so now we have different configuration, we have five loops between link of two and five.

466
00:59:50,130 --> 00:59:52,860
Marcin Kisielowski: But we also have a different intertwined there.

467
00:59:55,800 --> 00:59:56,160
Marcin Kisielowski: and

468
00:59:57,840 --> 01:00:00,030
Marcin Kisielowski: And this this.

469
01:00:01,500 --> 01:00:03,330
Marcin Kisielowski: This transformation.

470
01:00:03,360 --> 01:00:04,800
Marcin Kisielowski: Of look configuration is.

471
01:00:05,160 --> 01:00:17,310
Marcin Kisielowski: Quite standard one is I as I described you in words it's just a very mutes the indices I J, but it can, it can also flip flip a loop.

472
01:00:19,020 --> 01:00:44,700
Marcin Kisielowski: So, because I assume I is smaller than Jay so this G can break this condition, then I will call it a flip and this flips have a have important have consequence on the action on the Internet whiners when I flip happens, it introduces a phase phase of minus one to the power to.

473
01:00:46,650 --> 01:01:04,590
Marcin Kisielowski: So the action on the intertwined or space is some permutation of the innocence of the intertwining multiplied by the number of times flips of loops or cure multiplied here by sorry invite to twice the.

474
01:01:05,820 --> 01:01:07,320
Marcin Kisielowski: Fixed spin level.

475
01:01:08,760 --> 01:01:09,210
Marcin Kisielowski: and

476
01:01:10,440 --> 01:01:12,930
Marcin Kisielowski: Now this averaging operator looks.

477
01:01:15,570 --> 01:01:23,700
Marcin Kisielowski: Has the following farm, so my idea so on on the example see mana asks asks.

478
01:01:24,840 --> 01:01:30,840
Marcin Kisielowski: So when you consider, for example, one look at it between link.

479
01:01:32,130 --> 01:01:32,550
Marcin Kisielowski: link.

480
01:01:33,810 --> 01:01:36,480
Marcin Kisielowski: Say one and far then.

481
01:01:39,120 --> 01:01:51,510
Marcin Kisielowski: What kind of state, you would consider symmetric I mean what kinds of let's go back what kind of state with one loop, you would consider symmetric.

482
01:01:54,420 --> 01:02:03,570
Marcin Kisielowski: And my idea is that okay take this loop between one link then transform it with this.

483
01:02:05,760 --> 01:02:06,480
Marcin Kisielowski: With this.

484
01:02:08,370 --> 01:02:10,470
Marcin Kisielowski: group element from our cube.

485
01:02:11,730 --> 01:02:16,170
Marcin Kisielowski: And added to the previous one, so this is a kind of.

486
01:02:18,150 --> 01:02:19,710
Marcin Kisielowski: This is a kind of some.

487
01:02:22,170 --> 01:02:29,580
Marcin Kisielowski: Some of states with with different with loops in different positions so.

488
01:02:32,670 --> 01:02:40,620
Marcin Kisielowski: let's go to for violence case, maybe for an example because in for violent case when when you have this could be.

489
01:02:41,640 --> 01:02:45,900
Marcin Kisielowski: transferred to for violence case when this group will be just.

490
01:02:47,670 --> 01:02:59,610
Marcin Kisielowski: will be just also permutations but so they will permeate all the links, so the symmetric state, the first idea for symmetric state is.

491
01:03:00,810 --> 01:03:06,420
Marcin Kisielowski: Take a look, between a pair of links plus.

492
01:03:07,980 --> 01:03:10,860
Marcin Kisielowski: A loop between another pair of things, plus.

493
01:03:11,880 --> 01:03:14,220
Marcin Kisielowski: Another plus and.

494
01:03:16,530 --> 01:03:23,370
Marcin Kisielowski: Plus any configuration of a little bit when elling so and this this state would be kind of.

495
01:03:24,720 --> 01:03:25,710
Marcin Kisielowski: What would be.

496
01:03:26,520 --> 01:03:28,230
simone: semi Matilda.

497
01:03:29,520 --> 01:03:29,940
Marcin Kisielowski: Sorry.

498
01:03:30,600 --> 01:03:30,870
simone: What is.

499
01:03:31,770 --> 01:03:35,310
Marcin Kisielowski: This Sigma tilda is a permutation of the.

500
01:03:36,480 --> 01:03:40,620
Marcin Kisielowski: Of the indices of of the intertwine are because.

501
01:03:41,820 --> 01:03:43,290
Marcin Kisielowski: Because this.

502
01:03:45,390 --> 01:03:45,810
Marcin Kisielowski: This sort.

503
01:03:46,350 --> 01:03:46,650
Marcin Kisielowski: of it.

504
01:03:47,280 --> 01:03:48,990
simone: So, because you started with the semantic.

505
01:03:50,400 --> 01:04:01,050
simone: So if the stage we're not semantically and now you start normals you make a mess, of course, but I guess the fact that you were starting from something that was already very symmetric is what.

506
01:04:02,070 --> 01:04:08,580
simone: may make the procedure work so is the intuition that basically you're just.

507
01:04:09,720 --> 01:04:17,790
simone: and put on furthermore you're probably flipping every time to normal so so that there should be no problem with the closure conditions as well right.

508
01:04:18,690 --> 01:04:32,430
simone: So basically the intuition, is that you're just intertwined is always the same name it's always in the six volume case is always 100010 and so on, as you pointed out, is just that now.

509
01:04:33,480 --> 01:04:39,390
simone: Which one is 100 which one is 010 you are paired mutating them.

510
01:04:40,650 --> 01:04:47,880
simone: And when you bear mute them at your commute every time to so that the closure condition is always satisfied, is it something like this that is going on.

511
01:04:50,670 --> 01:04:51,480
Marcin Kisielowski: I didn't.

512
01:04:52,380 --> 01:04:52,680
See I.

513
01:04:53,790 --> 01:04:56,040
Marcin Kisielowski: didn't but so did.

514
01:04:56,850 --> 01:05:01,050
simone: The final result you can write it as a sample intertwines right.

515
01:05:01,860 --> 01:05:03,510
Marcin Kisielowski: refineries, yes, yes.

516
01:05:03,900 --> 01:05:13,770
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes, this is some of the intertwined there's but notice that when you change and put a look, when you have already a loop in some position.

517
01:05:14,850 --> 01:05:27,810
Marcin Kisielowski: And you move it with that the former ISM to another with with this G with G here when you move it to another position you most probably end up in orthogonal space.

518
01:05:30,810 --> 01:05:38,760
simone: Maybe was a very naive question usually like in demon's regularization when you add the loop, but you also change this been here, this is not happening right.

519
01:05:38,820 --> 01:05:39,300
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes, this.

520
01:05:40,290 --> 01:05:41,820
simone: Is preserving the spins.

521
01:05:43,350 --> 01:05:43,770
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes.

522
01:05:44,130 --> 01:05:49,470
simone: Okay, so when you see now state you mean just in terms of the intertwining or.

523
01:05:50,190 --> 01:05:51,210
Marcin Kisielowski: No, no, no.

524
01:05:51,270 --> 01:05:53,490
Marcin Kisielowski: No Okay, because it's a.

525
01:05:56,040 --> 01:06:14,760
Marcin Kisielowski: I i'm in this space, I make a very jink with respect to the form morpheus which do not move nodes of the graph so this G is not such in the form of racism and so when I have a loop between link one and link to.

526
01:06:16,740 --> 01:06:31,710
Marcin Kisielowski: In my state and in a spin networks, they take a spin network state with the loop between link one and one link three and then consider SP network state with a loop between link one and link five.

527
01:06:33,600 --> 01:06:34,020
Okay.

528
01:06:36,150 --> 01:06:36,690
Marcin Kisielowski: Then.

529
01:06:38,880 --> 01:06:47,340
Marcin Kisielowski: Then they are, they are in different different spaces in this vortex Gilbert space.

530
01:06:47,730 --> 01:06:51,480
simone: I see, yes, these will do defined earlier on, yes okay.

531
01:06:53,190 --> 01:06:53,850
Marcin Kisielowski: So now.

532
01:06:54,870 --> 01:07:08,250
Marcin Kisielowski: So now, I need to take into account that this out cube is is, can I can take me from one space into orthogonal space or can leave me in the same space so.

533
01:07:11,220 --> 01:07:14,070
Marcin Kisielowski: But it's important it's only important that it.

534
01:07:16,440 --> 01:07:23,250
Marcin Kisielowski: It it moves along in this Tower changes this look configuration.

535
01:07:24,390 --> 01:07:27,750
Marcin Kisielowski: And States with different look configuration or a toggle now.

536
01:07:29,400 --> 01:07:30,600
Marcin Kisielowski: So they're in different.

537
01:07:31,800 --> 01:07:33,240
Marcin Kisielowski: different components in.

538
01:07:34,620 --> 01:07:43,230
Marcin Kisielowski: In this, the composition, although the invariance basis are the same, but then look configuration is different and the spaces are orthogonal.

539
01:07:44,610 --> 01:07:49,830
simone: I see, so I cannot think of the result of this operation in terms of the.

540
01:07:51,030 --> 01:07:59,100
simone: In terms of our linear combination of intertwined there's on the regional graph without any loop added, I cannot do this.

541
01:08:00,270 --> 01:08:00,930
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes.

542
01:08:01,230 --> 01:08:05,820
Marcin Kisielowski: Okay, just because it's they have another label they.

543
01:08:05,850 --> 01:08:08,040
Marcin Kisielowski: have this look configuration label which.

544
01:08:11,640 --> 01:08:12,510
Marcin Kisielowski: Which.

545
01:08:15,450 --> 01:08:18,720
Marcin Kisielowski: understates with different labels are orthogonal.

546
01:08:19,560 --> 01:08:31,320
simone: And just to understand what do you have in mind here is to realize the full Armenian constraint or adjust the induced scale or curvature part of it.

547
01:08:31,980 --> 01:08:33,090
Marcin Kisielowski: fall for.

548
01:08:33,390 --> 01:08:40,080
simone: The fool so also the part that contains extrinsic curvature he would like to realize within this framework.

549
01:08:41,280 --> 01:08:42,030
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes.

550
01:08:43,440 --> 01:08:43,800
Marcin Kisielowski: I mean.

551
01:08:45,330 --> 01:08:52,350
simone: I would expect that to change the spins maybe we can come back to this at the end at least now I also better how these construction workers.

552
01:08:52,620 --> 01:08:55,890
Marcin Kisielowski: So in the approach I followed.

553
01:08:59,040 --> 01:09:01,770
Marcin Kisielowski: It from from the from the papers.

554
01:09:04,350 --> 01:09:05,520
Marcin Kisielowski: I described before.

555
01:09:07,890 --> 01:09:12,900
Marcin Kisielowski: They this beans are are are not changed just.

556
01:09:14,430 --> 01:09:15,330
Marcin Kisielowski: Just the.

557
01:09:16,380 --> 01:09:17,910
Marcin Kisielowski: loops are added in.

558
01:09:19,170 --> 01:09:19,650
Marcin Kisielowski: English.

559
01:09:21,150 --> 01:09:21,630
simone: Thank you.

560
01:09:21,810 --> 01:09:24,060
Marcin Kisielowski: in different ways, thank you.

561
01:09:28,380 --> 01:09:29,730
Marcin Kisielowski: What I looked at.

562
01:09:30,150 --> 01:09:36,630
Marcin Kisielowski: is how how the dimension of of the space after the cut off.

563
01:09:39,540 --> 01:09:43,980
Marcin Kisielowski: looks like when we vary the cut off it's because.

564
01:09:45,450 --> 01:09:49,800
Marcin Kisielowski: i'm thinking about some calculation on on a computer and.

565
01:09:51,450 --> 01:09:59,940
Marcin Kisielowski: 10 to the power six is the rank of the metrics you can typically diagonal lights on on a supercomputer.

566
01:10:01,170 --> 01:10:02,280
Marcin Kisielowski: The restriction is.

567
01:10:03,330 --> 01:10:12,600
Marcin Kisielowski: mainly due to memory, because if you have 10 to the power six and you need to start a matrix, then you have 10 to the power 12.

568
01:10:14,370 --> 01:10:16,290
Marcin Kisielowski: Bytes roughly speaking and.

569
01:10:17,940 --> 01:10:25,440
Marcin Kisielowski: This is a around the capacity, you have and we see that would spin one half we could.

570
01:10:26,460 --> 01:10:45,870
Marcin Kisielowski: We could calculate up to five loops would spin one up to four three half's and tool, the same up to four loops and the rest, I in my study five have up to five, we could do only diagonal is up to three loops.

571
01:10:48,090 --> 01:10:50,280
Western: it's you know very quick question.

572
01:10:51,870 --> 01:10:59,010
Western: gamma the Barbarians parameter or and the do you have any difference in the competition or whether you use a different one.

573
01:11:00,030 --> 01:11:01,320
Marcin Kisielowski: So right now.

574
01:11:04,890 --> 01:11:06,630
Marcin Kisielowski: Right now, I I.

575
01:11:08,250 --> 01:11:20,280
Marcin Kisielowski: Fixing gamma will be at the level of data analyzing the operator so once you figure gamma, then you get some operator and operator matrix which.

576
01:11:23,430 --> 01:11:23,970
Marcin Kisielowski: Which.

577
01:11:25,980 --> 01:11:44,250
Marcin Kisielowski: So this slide I did in this work, I do not fix gamma because i'm just talking about some general properties, but in calculating the eigenvalues yes, I will need to fix gamma it, it appears explicitly in the in this physical hamiltonian.

578
01:11:45,900 --> 01:11:46,290
Marcin Kisielowski: and

579
01:11:47,730 --> 01:11:52,470
Marcin Kisielowski: I could, in principle, look for different values of gum our fix it to the standard one.

580
01:11:54,270 --> 01:11:55,650
Marcin Kisielowski: This is in front of me.

581
01:11:57,030 --> 01:11:57,390
Western: Thank you.

582
01:11:58,380 --> 01:11:58,890
Marcin Kisielowski: Thank you.

583
01:12:02,160 --> 01:12:15,420
Marcin Kisielowski: What I observed, is that the symmetry reduction rate that is the dimension of the reduced space to the full space with the cut of L.

584
01:12:17,490 --> 01:12:29,340
Marcin Kisielowski: stabilizers seems to stabilize quite fast, at the very value 24, which is the number of elements of the group of symmetry of the cube.

585
01:12:30,600 --> 01:12:30,990
Marcin Kisielowski: and

586
01:12:32,430 --> 01:12:41,340
Marcin Kisielowski: And we see the larger spin this, the faster it stabilizes at the edit this at this value 24.

587
01:12:43,710 --> 01:12:45,990
Marcin Kisielowski: And i'll discuss.

588
01:12:47,040 --> 01:12:49,410
Marcin Kisielowski: Let me know summarize and discuss.

589
01:12:50,460 --> 01:12:55,650
Marcin Kisielowski: In particular i'll discuss this value 24 in the summary second discussion section.

590
01:12:58,140 --> 01:12:59,010
Marcin Kisielowski: The restriction.

591
01:13:00,030 --> 01:13:10,260
Marcin Kisielowski: To homogeneous is a Tropic sector of loop quantum gravity that I proposed leads to substantial reduction of the degrees of freedom, first of all.

592
01:13:11,970 --> 01:13:19,230
Marcin Kisielowski: We limited to a lattice with with all equal spins on the sides.

593
01:13:20,310 --> 01:13:21,540
Marcin Kisielowski: And, moreover.

594
01:13:23,130 --> 01:13:36,420
Marcin Kisielowski: We took one Eigen vector of on operator CN at some fixed node and we tensor multiply it for each node of the lattice.

595
01:13:40,050 --> 01:13:47,820
Marcin Kisielowski: And so, this is also a huge reduction of degrees of freedom, and this is something you could.

596
01:13:49,170 --> 01:13:52,530
Marcin Kisielowski: You could, I think, think of.

597
01:13:58,230 --> 01:14:06,870
Marcin Kisielowski: But what what I bring here more is that there is also a symmetry reduction at the level of the intertwined.

598
01:14:08,670 --> 01:14:10,620
Marcin Kisielowski: And this symmetry reduction.

599
01:14:11,640 --> 01:14:21,120
Marcin Kisielowski: is useful here in the canonical of quantum gravity, but I believe it can get to be interesting, also, for example, for.

600
01:14:22,290 --> 01:14:25,620
Marcin Kisielowski: group field theory where they consider.

601
01:14:27,150 --> 01:14:30,900
Marcin Kisielowski: some kind of comedy in psychotropic states which are quite similar.

602
01:14:34,320 --> 01:14:42,870
Marcin Kisielowski: I noticed that diverging should include non trivial face factor to accommodate leaving speciality coherent intertwined.

603
01:14:44,700 --> 01:15:02,340
Marcin Kisielowski: And I I found that after truncation APP to Allah loops we get roughly 24 times smaller sub spaces of intertwined hours, so there is a further reduction of the degrees of freedom.

604
01:15:03,390 --> 01:15:13,260
Marcin Kisielowski: And is it is that 24 small or large, probably it's small compared to the restrictions we did.

605
01:15:14,700 --> 01:15:16,800
Marcin Kisielowski: We did here but.

606
01:15:17,940 --> 01:15:20,730
Marcin Kisielowski: For computers this factor 24.

607
01:15:22,290 --> 01:15:36,090
Marcin Kisielowski: turns out to be also important because most diagonal ization algorithm algorithms have complexity close to our end cube where and is the rank of the metrics.

608
01:15:36,720 --> 01:16:01,860
Marcin Kisielowski: So this means that we get around 25 to the power three, that is, two to the power force speed up compared to the approach, then, if let's say approach, where we would not make this a very junk in the space of entertainers and practically this speed up means that instead of diagnosing.

609
01:16:03,480 --> 01:16:16,890
Marcin Kisielowski: compute and metrics on on all the resources of my computing Center I could diagonal is a matrix on on my laptop.

610
01:16:20,640 --> 01:16:30,660
Marcin Kisielowski: And I hope that this will allow us to study the Eigen states of the operator of this scholar constraint operator in the reduced space.

611
01:16:31,980 --> 01:16:33,600
Marcin Kisielowski: In the reduced spaces.

612
01:16:34,650 --> 01:16:51,390
Marcin Kisielowski: And I we introduced a cut off and my other result from another paper about a volume operator suggest that this truncation has an interpretation in terms of.

613
01:16:52,680 --> 01:16:54,420
Marcin Kisielowski: truncation in the volume.

614
01:16:56,070 --> 01:16:59,610
Marcin Kisielowski: At least in the spin one half case I showed that.

615
01:17:00,840 --> 01:17:04,650
Marcin Kisielowski: The truncation is precise is a truncation in the volume.

616
01:17:07,080 --> 01:17:07,500
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes.

617
01:17:07,800 --> 01:17:10,410
simone: I need I need to leave, can I ask a question now.

618
01:17:10,440 --> 01:17:10,830
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes.

619
01:17:10,920 --> 01:17:11,640
Yes, of course.

620
01:17:12,870 --> 01:17:23,490
simone: curiosity about this 24 like what, why is it so big in fact that reduced, you may have expected you know, like thinking of the quantum reduced.

621
01:17:25,980 --> 01:17:33,210
simone: quantum gravity that intertwine is basically just one regardless of what is the spin.

622
01:17:33,660 --> 01:17:39,300
simone: And so that the So what are because it's the only day like the regular cube.

623
01:17:39,870 --> 01:17:53,790
simone: So what are these other shapes that you are allowing when you increase the speed, but stealing system is on virginity and so there'll be I think it will be very interesting to understand the gentleman this do you know it already.

624
01:17:54,690 --> 01:17:55,170
All right.

625
01:17:56,610 --> 01:18:12,540
Marcin Kisielowski: Well, I don't know, but I have some idea So yes, and also when I mentioned gfp, let me just mentioned that in JFK they also choose the highest highest volume eigenvalues.

626
01:18:15,210 --> 01:18:23,760
Marcin Kisielowski: So they also make a bigger restriction in a sentence and and notice that this factor it when.

627
01:18:24,840 --> 01:18:27,360
Marcin Kisielowski: This 2024 up.

628
01:18:30,030 --> 01:18:41,100
Marcin Kisielowski: appears for larger spins and spins equals one half we have two dimensional space described by the tool.

629
01:18:42,810 --> 01:18:52,260
Marcin Kisielowski: Living special a coherent intertwined there's corresponding to the Tokyo one with one orientation and the other with opposite orientation so.

630
01:18:52,710 --> 01:18:57,630
simone: It seems to me to exist for any value of this pain right.

631
01:18:57,780 --> 01:18:58,920
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes, that's right.

632
01:18:59,010 --> 01:18:59,430
simone: that's right.

633
01:18:59,640 --> 01:19:04,680
simone: And what are the other states, now that appear when you increase the speeds, do you know.

634
01:19:05,310 --> 01:19:10,410
Marcin Kisielowski: I don't know I expect that they may be some kind of.

635
01:19:11,640 --> 01:19:19,500
Marcin Kisielowski: some kind of a mixture some kind of combination of the spin spin spin one half.

636
01:19:20,520 --> 01:19:44,880
Marcin Kisielowski: cubes with opposite orientations I don't know this is my earthly idea that since two orientations appear here, I suppose, they may be responsible for for for for for this this many configurations I ended when I started this project I expected a bigger reduction.

637
01:19:45,390 --> 01:19:47,100
Marcin Kisielowski: So this was disappointing.

638
01:19:47,760 --> 01:19:49,500
simone: For me it's very interesting.

639
01:19:49,800 --> 01:20:00,540
simone: I think it's very easy in a sentence promising that you're not getting at these bigger reaction that we naval expected, it means that you're hinting at other degrees of freedom other one can.

640
01:20:01,710 --> 01:20:06,960
simone: study, even though is restricting to homogeneity and so there'll be means that is not just simply.

641
01:20:07,410 --> 01:20:11,730
simone: There are certain positions orientations, maybe do something like this that is also occurring that.

642
01:20:11,730 --> 01:20:16,380
Marcin Kisielowski: Might not notice that I do not do not restrict.

643
01:20:17,430 --> 01:20:28,200
Marcin Kisielowski: The spatial curvature in in my model so so kind of there is this parameter the spatial clarify chair.

644
01:20:29,730 --> 01:20:44,220
Marcin Kisielowski: I can be can be different it's not set to one or minus one or zero so, so there are different it's comma genius is a Tropic but not fixed fixed by the spatial curvature is not fixed so.

645
01:20:44,400 --> 01:20:49,410
simone: In these extra degrees of freedom, you have a maybe what tells you what the core.

646
01:20:49,440 --> 01:20:52,860
simone: gives you room before non trivial curvature and yes that's right.

647
01:20:52,920 --> 01:20:53,460
Marcin Kisielowski: that's right.

648
01:20:54,960 --> 01:20:56,730
simone: Sorry, I had to leave, thank you very much.

649
01:20:56,940 --> 01:20:58,140
Marcin Kisielowski: Thank you, thank you.

650
01:21:00,480 --> 01:21:00,930
simone: So.

651
01:21:02,010 --> 01:21:03,180
Marcin Kisielowski: As I said before.

652
01:21:05,970 --> 01:21:10,020
Marcin Kisielowski: My goal is still to look for the.

653
01:21:11,130 --> 01:21:14,340
Marcin Kisielowski: For the Eigen states and actually.

654
01:21:15,900 --> 01:21:25,290
Marcin Kisielowski: My my my dream, if everything goes well that, for example, I can it turns out that the lowest energy eigenvalues are.

655
01:21:26,310 --> 01:21:33,630
Marcin Kisielowski: Are are well described, I mean I get some converging of the eigenvalues when I increase the cutoff.

656
01:21:34,890 --> 01:21:47,790
Marcin Kisielowski: Then I could consider kind of similar states coherence states another states analogous to the one in accuracy, for example, peaked at.

657
01:21:49,230 --> 01:21:55,740
Marcin Kisielowski: at low values of the gravity scholar gravitational part of this color constraint.

658
01:21:57,570 --> 01:21:59,790
Marcin Kisielowski: operator and.

659
01:22:01,170 --> 01:22:20,160
Marcin Kisielowski: And one could in principle in this region study study, if there is a big banks or investigate the stability of the States under the quantum dynamics generated by the physical hamiltonian and Let me close and now with just short remark that this.

660
01:22:21,240 --> 01:22:25,650
Marcin Kisielowski: technical simplification does not apply only to the.

661
01:22:26,790 --> 01:22:48,810
Marcin Kisielowski: To the canonical theory, it also has some application to the covariance theory at least in the formulation, we proposed in 2019 in our spin phones a history of symmetry reduced state is described by states in the symmetry reduced space and.

662
01:22:49,830 --> 01:22:50,790
Marcin Kisielowski: This means that.

663
01:22:52,770 --> 01:23:05,490
Marcin Kisielowski: That in order of the vertical expansion, the complexity of the problem gets roughly 21st to the power and minus one times smaller due to symmetry reduction, thank you for your attention.

664
01:23:26,340 --> 01:23:26,670
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes.

665
01:23:27,660 --> 01:23:39,270
Cong Zhang: Okay, so, so I have a I have a comment on this on this on this algorithm you want to use this final cut off to to to get this, I can state, and I can value.

666
01:23:40,140 --> 01:23:51,240
Cong Zhang: So, as my understanding, so what you want to do here is to write this again stated as the real function of the numbers of the loose right.

667
01:23:52,440 --> 01:23:53,190
Cong Zhang: Something like that.

668
01:23:56,010 --> 01:23:58,380
Marcin Kisielowski: I wave function of volume.

669
01:23:59,100 --> 01:24:12,450
Cong Zhang: Of whoa Okay, a volume of the loop okay of volume but anyway, so this is something like a discrete the value of something and as my understanding, if you want to do this finance.

670
01:24:12,630 --> 01:24:28,920
Cong Zhang: at all, so the precondition should be that the against data of this hamiltonian operator should be exponentially decay, something that is potentially the key for large value of the volume.

671
01:24:29,460 --> 01:24:42,780
Cong Zhang: So if the against data is exponentially decay, then the icon status will be concentrated add some finite value of this volume So if you just choose a very large volume.

672
01:24:43,290 --> 01:25:05,280
Cong Zhang: Such that this value of this volume is added to it as the exponential, the key is exponentially, the key features of this against data, then the against data of the hamiltonian operator can be well approximated by the against data of this finite matrix.

673
01:25:06,090 --> 01:25:07,410
Marcin Kisielowski: Just this would be ideal.

674
01:25:08,220 --> 01:25:24,810
Cong Zhang: yeah so actually I did I actually use the dis master the to do diagonal lines that this hamiltonian operator of the loop quantum black hole modal and I get this experience in intuitively.

675
01:25:26,520 --> 01:25:27,750
Marcin Kisielowski: Great Thank you.

676
01:25:28,590 --> 01:25:39,210
Cong Zhang: And also, I have a question so so so so for for your symmetry reduction so as my understanding, so you'll have like a to.

677
01:25:39,840 --> 01:25:52,230
Cong Zhang: You have to group arrogant or something like that the first is that so when you do this simply reduction, so you do some averaging procedure with respect to the.

678
01:25:52,680 --> 01:26:09,840
Cong Zhang: To the cemetery group of the cubicle graph and the second is that the venue do that when you do this when you do this work hats here, but the space, there is also a group averaging weather is back to the symmetry of the graph right.

679
01:26:11,310 --> 01:26:13,770
Marcin Kisielowski: So that's the largest the lattice.

680
01:26:14,070 --> 01:26:14,910
Cong Zhang: yeah a lot.

681
01:26:14,940 --> 01:26:19,500
Cong Zhang: yeah so I just I didn't get the difference between this to.

682
01:26:19,530 --> 01:26:22,920
Cong Zhang: This region So what is this too.

683
01:26:24,030 --> 01:26:41,700
Marcin Kisielowski: So maybe my presentation was confusing there's no to everything there is only one just I somehow thought that it would be best to present first the idea on some simple example some first.

684
01:26:42,870 --> 01:26:45,510
Marcin Kisielowski: It was a kind of example of.

685
01:26:46,980 --> 01:26:49,290
Marcin Kisielowski: When you take the cut of an equal.

686
01:26:50,400 --> 01:26:51,870
Marcin Kisielowski: Equal zero.

687
01:26:53,400 --> 01:26:54,150
Cong Zhang: mm hmm.

688
01:26:54,240 --> 01:27:03,330
Marcin Kisielowski: So this is the first is how it works in the space where you take zero loops so the cut of zero.

689
01:27:05,130 --> 01:27:05,760
Marcin Kisielowski: But this is.

690
01:27:07,200 --> 01:27:08,730
Marcin Kisielowski: The average income is one.

691
01:27:09,960 --> 01:27:12,930
Marcin Kisielowski: And in the full space, it was somehow.

692
01:27:14,850 --> 01:27:33,030
Marcin Kisielowski: There are many technical ideas there and I thought that, first, if I start first with the with the with this simpler case and equal to zero, I can explain better what's happening in the intertwined nurse because I found its particular interesting.

693
01:27:37,500 --> 01:27:38,610
Marcin Kisielowski: So directly recently watched.

694
01:27:39,150 --> 01:27:40,290
Cong Zhang: him to reduce the.

695
01:27:40,290 --> 01:27:45,900
Cong Zhang: status is a is a is in this work exhale bit of space right yes.

696
01:27:47,490 --> 01:27:49,770
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes, yes, but he noticed that.

697
01:27:51,900 --> 01:27:59,130
Marcin Kisielowski: Since the diverging map in this hour simple case is an isometric so.

698
01:28:01,020 --> 01:28:05,640
Marcin Kisielowski: So you can just work in this space of spin networks.

699
01:28:07,170 --> 01:28:12,570
Marcin Kisielowski: So when you introduce a cut off from the calculation out point of view, you can work.

700
01:28:14,520 --> 01:28:15,060
Marcin Kisielowski: I mean.

701
01:28:16,680 --> 01:28:21,990
Marcin Kisielowski: I mean when you said equal to zero and use this map into.

702
01:28:23,310 --> 01:28:25,260
Cong Zhang: This is is.

703
01:28:25,320 --> 01:28:29,730
Cong Zhang: This either is the is to define this work, I see with a space right.

704
01:28:30,300 --> 01:28:31,350
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes, yes, yes.

705
01:28:31,380 --> 01:28:33,030
Cong Zhang: yeah yeah.

706
01:28:34,650 --> 01:28:36,510
Marcin Kisielowski: yeah there's only one my.

707
01:28:36,540 --> 01:28:41,850
Marcin Kisielowski: answer is basic, my answer is that there is only one leveraging.

708
01:28:43,260 --> 01:28:44,580
Marcin Kisielowski: And this is a.

709
01:28:45,720 --> 01:28:47,910
Marcin Kisielowski: This was just a particular case.

710
01:28:51,780 --> 01:28:54,630
Cong Zhang: The fund is simply reduce the state.

711
01:28:57,690 --> 01:28:58,200
Marcin Kisielowski: Sorry.

712
01:28:59,280 --> 01:29:05,910
Cong Zhang: It is this this this for Jackson P here is used to define the same to reduce the stadium.

713
01:29:06,660 --> 01:29:15,840
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes, you get a tower here, and the one the lowest component of the Tower is the space I described before so.

714
01:29:17,460 --> 01:29:28,770
Marcin Kisielowski: So this is also reflected in in in mind notation so I plot here DEM dimension of a cube jl.

715
01:29:31,380 --> 01:29:31,980
Marcin Kisielowski: and

716
01:29:33,870 --> 01:29:39,240
Marcin Kisielowski: At the beginning, I plot kill dimension H cube G zero.

717
01:29:46,710 --> 01:29:47,400
Western: Hello Marcin.

718
01:29:48,660 --> 01:29:50,070
Western: Okay, can you ask the question.

719
01:29:50,670 --> 01:29:51,720
Cong Zhang: Okay, so so can can.

720
01:29:51,720 --> 01:29:52,320
Cong Zhang: Can can.

721
01:29:52,380 --> 01:30:06,090
Cong Zhang: Ask my question further okay so so so let's so let's meet describe my my question in another way, so the point is like is this simply use the State to do more with them in the environment.

722
01:30:08,700 --> 01:30:12,900
Marcin Kisielowski: that's a good question, so the answer is.

723
01:30:14,430 --> 01:30:20,250
Marcin Kisielowski: As a state is it is as a wave function, it is not.

724
01:30:22,560 --> 01:30:31,770
Marcin Kisielowski: Because of this, face factor here, so if you want to have living speciality coherent intertwined there's you need to choose this face.

725
01:30:32,850 --> 01:30:47,460
Marcin Kisielowski: And with this face your state at the end of the day, will be different murphy's invariant but the way function with the way function will be not because you will have this transformation property.

726
01:30:48,600 --> 01:30:48,930
With.

727
01:30:49,950 --> 01:30:53,340
Marcin Kisielowski: With with with this face factor here so.

728
01:30:55,140 --> 01:31:01,440
Marcin Kisielowski: So the vertex hilbert space, does the average in to the respect to the former physics, which you do not.

729
01:31:02,490 --> 01:31:06,030
Marcin Kisielowski: move the notes what you're left with are.

730
01:31:08,460 --> 01:31:15,000
Marcin Kisielowski: What you are left with our just our the default murphy's miss which which move the notes.

731
01:31:15,240 --> 01:31:16,500
Cong Zhang: yeah I know.

732
01:31:17,970 --> 01:31:18,600
Marcin Kisielowski: So.

733
01:31:20,640 --> 01:31:23,880
Marcin Kisielowski: So if you set this face factor equal to one you get.

734
01:31:25,560 --> 01:31:35,010
Marcin Kisielowski: You get the former policeman very young boy function and if not, you get the not default murphy's mean variant one way function but you get.

735
01:31:36,150 --> 01:31:37,980
Marcin Kisielowski: The form Orpheus mean variance state.

736
01:31:39,570 --> 01:31:41,520
Marcin Kisielowski: So there is this subtle point.

737
01:31:41,730 --> 01:31:42,270
here.

738
01:31:43,530 --> 01:31:47,640
Marcin Kisielowski: which I didn't race because of.

739
01:31:48,180 --> 01:31:48,690
Marcin Kisielowski: Time so.

740
01:31:48,750 --> 01:31:55,710
Cong Zhang: If this G is is just a number rather than this happy is does the indigo rather than is happy bigger.

741
01:31:56,160 --> 01:32:00,840
Cong Zhang: Right, this is this, then this is the form of a dummy environment.

742
01:32:02,130 --> 01:32:03,270
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes, yes.

743
01:32:04,890 --> 01:32:06,240
OK OK OK.

744
01:32:07,260 --> 01:32:10,200
Western: alomar senior just a very nice question.

745
01:32:10,710 --> 01:32:11,160
Marcin Kisielowski: uh huh.

746
01:32:11,370 --> 01:32:23,490
Western: Okay, so can we go back to the first block that you showed us, yes, that one okay so here, I understand what you're doing but it's not entirely clear to me how you're doing it so.

747
01:32:23,640 --> 01:32:26,040
Western: I already see as the computational complexity.

748
01:32:31,650 --> 01:32:32,430
Marcin Kisielowski: that's me think.

749
01:32:33,930 --> 01:32:38,040
Marcin Kisielowski: What i'm doing here is first is the.

750
01:32:39,450 --> 01:32:42,690
Marcin Kisielowski: First, I calculate the dimension of the space okay.

751
01:32:43,800 --> 01:32:46,530
Marcin Kisielowski: So for this, you need to calculate.

752
01:32:47,700 --> 01:32:51,210
Marcin Kisielowski: You need to calculate this this object here.

753
01:32:52,320 --> 01:32:57,510
Marcin Kisielowski: So you need to pair mute the indices of of this intertwined are here.

754
01:32:59,670 --> 01:33:01,590
Marcin Kisielowski: and add up for different.

755
01:33:02,790 --> 01:33:04,020
Marcin Kisielowski: cemeteries of the queue.

756
01:33:05,070 --> 01:33:05,520
Marcin Kisielowski: Some.

757
01:33:06,540 --> 01:33:09,900
Marcin Kisielowski: So the first try is.

758
01:33:11,790 --> 01:33:15,150
Marcin Kisielowski: The first try is to do it natively.

759
01:33:16,800 --> 01:33:20,640
Marcin Kisielowski: Then you need to construct the standard source as.

760
01:33:21,690 --> 01:33:29,310
Marcin Kisielowski: As using the standard three cotton three construction, as you construct the intertwine or as a three.

761
01:33:31,200 --> 01:33:31,890
Marcin Kisielowski: And then.

762
01:33:33,900 --> 01:33:35,100
Marcin Kisielowski: And then you.

763
01:33:36,690 --> 01:33:37,950
Marcin Kisielowski: You need to mute.

764
01:33:39,540 --> 01:33:40,020
Marcin Kisielowski: and

765
01:33:41,520 --> 01:33:51,270
Marcin Kisielowski: and add up, so you get 24 summations and the difficulty is in constructing all the.

766
01:33:53,040 --> 01:33:57,090
Marcin Kisielowski: All the intertwining of this farm, but this is not how I did it.

767
01:33:58,230 --> 01:34:00,210
Marcin Kisielowski: Because it was going to slow.

768
01:34:01,500 --> 01:34:02,580
Marcin Kisielowski: instead.

769
01:34:06,930 --> 01:34:08,850
Marcin Kisielowski: Transposition I used to.

770
01:34:10,770 --> 01:34:14,010
Marcin Kisielowski: Use the following observation that transposition of.

771
01:34:16,560 --> 01:34:26,430
Marcin Kisielowski: Has a representation matrix which can be written in terms of a six day symbol right simple one, it is a sparse matrix.

772
01:34:28,110 --> 01:34:28,500
Marcin Kisielowski: and

773
01:34:30,210 --> 01:34:30,660
Marcin Kisielowski: and

774
01:34:32,970 --> 01:34:38,760
Marcin Kisielowski: which I calculated for different path transposition, then I wrote down.

775
01:34:41,820 --> 01:34:49,860
Marcin Kisielowski: A permutation as a product of trans positions neighboring trans positions that is transposing neighboring numbers.

776
01:34:52,740 --> 01:34:53,370
Marcin Kisielowski: And then.

777
01:34:54,390 --> 01:35:02,610
Marcin Kisielowski: It was a matter of multiplication of sparse matrices which I did a music into mk sparse matrix or routines.

778
01:35:03,690 --> 01:35:13,050
Marcin Kisielowski: And what you end up with is you want a dimension of this space, so you want a trace of this operator.

779
01:35:15,210 --> 01:35:22,440
Marcin Kisielowski: So it's a matter of strike through calculating a trace of a product of some mattresses which are sparse.

780
01:35:23,490 --> 01:35:23,880
Marcin Kisielowski: and

781
01:35:24,900 --> 01:35:25,260
Marcin Kisielowski: and

782
01:35:26,580 --> 01:35:29,910
Marcin Kisielowski: I found it fastest to be done.

783
01:35:31,290 --> 01:35:31,920
Marcin Kisielowski: To be done.

784
01:35:34,650 --> 01:35:36,780
Marcin Kisielowski: like this, so.

785
01:35:38,700 --> 01:35:39,480
Marcin Kisielowski: So.

786
01:35:40,680 --> 01:35:41,280
Marcin Kisielowski: it's a.

787
01:35:44,160 --> 01:35:54,810
Marcin Kisielowski: In order it's hard for me to estimate the complexity right now I I just looked for the fastest method and calculate I didn't plan to.

788
01:35:57,360 --> 01:36:02,670
Marcin Kisielowski: To to go further, just my my point was just.

789
01:36:04,500 --> 01:36:08,640
Marcin Kisielowski: You see here I reach I reach the limit of.

790
01:36:09,900 --> 01:36:15,300
Marcin Kisielowski: Of of size of the mattresses which I could calculate and I could find all their points here.

791
01:36:16,860 --> 01:36:17,220
Marcin Kisielowski: and

792
01:36:19,320 --> 01:36:19,680
Marcin Kisielowski: and

793
01:36:21,060 --> 01:36:35,580
Marcin Kisielowski: So this was enough for me, so it was a part which I needed to optimize to get to spins 45 half's but I didn't study it really how I see that.

794
01:36:37,980 --> 01:36:41,490
Marcin Kisielowski: I don't remember, but I think the complexity grows grows.

795
01:36:42,990 --> 01:36:43,440
Marcin Kisielowski: Like.

796
01:36:44,700 --> 01:36:49,470
Marcin Kisielowski: exponentially, first with with increasing spin even.

797
01:36:50,610 --> 01:36:52,920
Western: Okay now it's medically you Thank you.

798
01:36:53,160 --> 01:36:54,240
Marcin Kisielowski: Thank you, thank you.

799
01:36:57,360 --> 01:36:58,800
Jorge Pullin: Is there another question in western.

800
01:37:08,460 --> 01:37:11,010
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: classical quick question, this time, if not, I can.

801
01:37:12,000 --> 01:37:12,420
Jorge Pullin: Go ahead.

802
01:37:13,470 --> 01:37:18,360
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So the question was really sad end of the day, there are several you know, like.

803
01:37:19,620 --> 01:37:35,280
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: approaches to also coming from Warsaw in many ways to kind of bridging call them know quantum Dr Lupo and cosmology in which one then writes down the expectation value of the the.

804
01:37:36,420 --> 01:37:47,400
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Execution hamiltonian and then sort of tries to see some effective dynamics so on so forth, so what happens in this approach and how is this related to what other people have said.

805
01:37:53,820 --> 01:37:54,450
Marcin Kisielowski: So.

806
01:37:57,330 --> 01:37:58,800
Marcin Kisielowski: In this approach.

807
01:38:03,780 --> 01:38:09,690
Marcin Kisielowski: In this approach, what is what is different here is that.

808
01:38:12,870 --> 01:38:13,470
Marcin Kisielowski: The.

809
01:38:15,270 --> 01:38:25,470
Marcin Kisielowski: The homogeneous isotopic space is an invariant space of the scholar constraint operator exactly.

810
01:38:27,120 --> 01:38:30,240
Marcin Kisielowski: So, for example, it is preserved by the evolution.

811
01:38:32,190 --> 01:38:32,550
Marcin Kisielowski: and

812
01:38:33,810 --> 01:38:34,230
Marcin Kisielowski: and

813
01:38:36,630 --> 01:38:39,270
Marcin Kisielowski: So there isn't, it is not an.

814
01:38:41,310 --> 01:38:46,020
Marcin Kisielowski: That the approximation here is in using cut off.

815
01:38:47,880 --> 01:38:54,300
Marcin Kisielowski: and not in the in varying the parameter of a coherent state.

816
01:38:55,380 --> 01:38:57,930
Marcin Kisielowski: And maybe my hope is.

817
01:38:59,430 --> 01:39:02,130
Marcin Kisielowski: To construct something.

818
01:39:03,720 --> 01:39:07,920
Marcin Kisielowski: which looks like like the elk you see.

819
01:39:09,030 --> 01:39:10,830
Marcin Kisielowski: Coherent state from.

820
01:39:11,850 --> 01:39:12,810
Marcin Kisielowski: The paper out.

821
01:39:14,280 --> 01:39:17,850
Marcin Kisielowski: By by you and and tomek.

822
01:39:18,900 --> 01:39:19,830
Marcin Kisielowski: For example.

823
01:39:20,940 --> 01:39:21,300
Marcin Kisielowski: and

824
01:39:25,800 --> 01:39:30,210
Marcin Kisielowski: I hope to get a better picture of the.

825
01:39:33,180 --> 01:39:35,820
Marcin Kisielowski: Of the low low volumes.

826
01:39:40,140 --> 01:39:43,050
Marcin Kisielowski: If I think about this application.

827
01:39:46,950 --> 01:39:48,330
Marcin Kisielowski: But, am I.

828
01:39:52,020 --> 01:39:52,320
and

829
01:39:53,820 --> 01:39:59,580
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So this is still working progress, so you can compare it with what other people have that in this year.

830
01:40:00,270 --> 01:40:01,470
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: terms of in terms of this.

831
01:40:02,250 --> 01:40:04,200
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: In terms of dynamics yet.

832
01:40:05,040 --> 01:40:10,770
Marcin Kisielowski: Yes, so I want to just say this thing that.

833
01:40:12,810 --> 01:40:14,760
Marcin Kisielowski: That in in.

834
01:40:15,930 --> 01:40:26,340
Marcin Kisielowski: In this symmetry reduction it's not kind of approximate because it seems, but because it's it's kind of exact in the sense.

835
01:40:26,340 --> 01:40:26,610
That.

836
01:40:27,780 --> 01:40:38,460
Marcin Kisielowski: When you read make this reduction, you still your operator does not bring you out of this space your gravitational of the scholar constraint operator.

837
01:40:40,260 --> 01:40:45,510
Marcin Kisielowski: Acting on homogeneous is a Tropic state is again homogeneous isotopic state.

838
01:40:47,610 --> 01:40:49,020
Marcin Kisielowski: And for coherence states.

839
01:40:50,190 --> 01:40:53,070
Marcin Kisielowski: In other approaches this.

840
01:40:54,540 --> 01:40:57,030
Marcin Kisielowski: seems to me more like approximate.

841
01:40:58,320 --> 01:41:01,650
Marcin Kisielowski: that the States are approximately homogeneous psychotropic.

842
01:41:02,460 --> 01:41:02,700
Okay.

843
01:41:04,530 --> 01:41:06,600
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Thank you all, thank you.

844
01:41:07,170 --> 01:41:07,710
Marcin Kisielowski: Thank you.

845
01:41:10,800 --> 01:41:11,700
Jorge Pullin: Any other questions.

846
01:41:26,280 --> 01:41:26,730
Thank you.