0
00:00:02,669 --> 00:00:09,450
Jorge Pullin: Our speakers is Wolfgang leland will speak about observers you versus gauge cemeteries boundary observers and quality local hardworking.

1
00:00:10,889 --> 00:00:12,030
wolfgang wieland: Thank you very much.

2
00:00:13,380 --> 00:00:14,219
And I.

3
00:00:15,690 --> 00:00:25,200
wolfgang wieland: So, before starting my talk, I would also like to thank for the opportunity that is given to me to present this work.

4
00:00:26,310 --> 00:00:30,090
Dongxue Qu: I was want to briefly apologize originally I was.

5
00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:36,570
wolfgang wieland: Hoping that I could speak about some new work that I have been working.

6
00:00:37,740 --> 00:00:58,980
wolfgang wieland: That i've been developing in the last couple of months, but things took a little longer, and so I decided instead to speak about something some of you may have already heard in previous talks of mine that I gave, for instance, that better Meta institute a couple of weeks ago.

7
00:01:00,180 --> 00:01:03,540
wolfgang wieland: In any case, I think it is safe to.

8
00:01:04,950 --> 00:01:06,660
just give you.

9
00:01:07,710 --> 00:01:11,460
A bit of an overview about what i've been.

10
00:01:13,380 --> 00:01:16,170
Working in the last couple of.

11
00:01:17,310 --> 00:01:29,850
wolfgang wieland: years, in fact, and how this fits together in a broader perspective with recent developments in various in our own field, but also in in other communities.

12
00:01:30,720 --> 00:01:43,080
wolfgang wieland: In fact, the outline of my talk is the following first of all, I give a very broad introduction and motivation for what i'm doing and then.

13
00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:55,410
wolfgang wieland: I will go a bit into more technical details for how to set up the problem of localizing degrees of freedom gravitation the gravitational degrees of freedom in.

14
00:01:56,910 --> 00:02:12,300
wolfgang wieland: domains that are bounded by non surfaces, and the third part is a bit of an upshot for what i'm interested next, and what I would have liked to expand it more about in the in this talk, in fact, I will speak.

15
00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:26,490
wolfgang wieland: about the introduction of the mercy parameter from these gnarled surface person perspective and how it affects over observers and deforms symmetries gauging interest.

16
00:02:27,060 --> 00:02:48,240
wolfgang wieland: And finally, I hope that we can have a bit of a discussion about what's going on in here, furthermore, I like to stress that you are very welcome to interrupt me at any point for questions and clarifications and if you have just comments that should be added.

17
00:02:49,530 --> 00:02:58,560
wolfgang wieland: If you think are important, so let's go into the into the first part, the general motivation, so what I.

18
00:02:59,640 --> 00:03:14,310
wolfgang wieland: am interested in here is to understand and isolate gravitational degrees of freedom in finite domains, and then the question arises, what kind of domains should be chosen.

19
00:03:15,300 --> 00:03:29,070
wolfgang wieland: should be choose and the boat, I would like to argue for is that we should think about causal regions, in other words, regions that are bounded by.

20
00:03:29,490 --> 00:03:49,140
wolfgang wieland: surfaces and i've indicated that a bit in in here in this comic picture and the different views, why this is interesting, so one possibility is to think that what's going on here is a mayor mayor cage fixing, in fact, we know that.

21
00:03:50,940 --> 00:03:59,040
wolfgang wieland: If you if you start out with the quantum State on a stage partially cushy hyper surface and let's call it side not.

22
00:03:59,520 --> 00:04:11,580
wolfgang wieland: The role of the hamiltonian constraints to relive it equation is that it is the generator of time like if you malfeasance on Shell and that, in other words.

23
00:04:12,390 --> 00:04:27,060
wolfgang wieland: States on that correspond to one hyper surface our gauge equivalent to state on that earlier heights and now you can ask how do I represent his cage equivalence class of states.

24
00:04:27,480 --> 00:04:31,980
Jonas Neuser: And one possibility is to kind of push this time evolution.

25
00:04:32,220 --> 00:04:44,220
wolfgang wieland: to its maximum cushy development in our words to local guys, the states on the surface itself and so that viewpoint is to say that.

26
00:04:45,180 --> 00:04:54,930
wolfgang wieland: going to not hyper surfaces is basically a neat way to characterize gravitation degrees of freedom, on the other hand.

27
00:04:55,920 --> 00:05:10,650
wolfgang wieland: I believe that this question is also related to the issue of course granny maybe how to build gravitational observers and go from smaller two variables that are defined in smaller regions two.

28
00:05:12,300 --> 00:05:31,500
wolfgang wieland: variables that that are more course that are closer and one perspective for this to characterize this problem that comes kind of from our Community is that this should think of course meaning in terms of gluing.

29
00:05:34,080 --> 00:05:43,080
wolfgang wieland: reputation and subsystems along common boundaries and then again the case of normal boundaries is kind of natural.

30
00:05:44,130 --> 00:05:50,670
wolfgang wieland: Finally, there is the issue of interest particles soft modes and animals that have been.

31
00:05:52,170 --> 00:06:00,000
wolfgang wieland: created a lot of interest recently from different communities, and in fact in general relativity.

32
00:06:01,110 --> 00:06:14,520
wolfgang wieland: Some of the simplest observers like energy momentum angular momentum, but also charges for super translations are or Center of mass they are analogous to.

33
00:06:15,210 --> 00:06:37,860
wolfgang wieland: The charges in a gauge theory to recharge aspect in quantum electrodynamics and then the question is, what is the role of these charges in in the quantum theory of gravity, should we treat them as super selection sectors as include it will be very different.

34
00:06:39,480 --> 00:06:45,420
wolfgang wieland: States have different charges at infinity correspond to.

35
00:06:46,650 --> 00:07:10,080
wolfgang wieland: unitary in equivalent representations, or should we try to also realize that the different super positions of this super selection sectors in in our quantum description, and this is a question not of just Mer mathematical interest it.

36
00:07:11,610 --> 00:07:13,260
wolfgang wieland: Perhaps has also.

37
00:07:15,630 --> 00:07:16,170
wolfgang wieland: Will.

38
00:07:18,570 --> 00:07:30,870
wolfgang wieland: Perhaps it will be actually relevant for actual experiments in fact we can think of creating in the laboratory super positions of.

39
00:07:32,580 --> 00:07:44,760
wolfgang wieland: Of gravitational systems to gravitate through the newtonian potential, in other words, we can think of, or more precisely because think of situations where we have.

40
00:07:45,660 --> 00:08:01,980
wolfgang wieland: quantum model and a lot of the cavendish experiment, where we have a source mass that is in superposition of different position, I can states, and then we should ask how can we characterize such an experiment, how do we.

41
00:08:02,730 --> 00:08:08,970
wolfgang wieland: How would we describe such an experiment in the quantum theory of gravity and.

42
00:08:10,890 --> 00:08:22,200
wolfgang wieland: There it is, then, then, then the position i'm states of the source mass they are, I can state of the Center of mass, but the Center of mass is just one of the.

43
00:08:22,530 --> 00:08:42,990
wolfgang wieland: sympathetic punk array charges at infinity so it seems actually necessary to consider such common superstitions of charges at infinity to characterize this particular thought experiment that may actually be realized in in in the near future.

44
00:08:44,460 --> 00:08:50,910
wolfgang wieland: And what is nice about this different viewpoints, is that they really bring together.

45
00:08:52,320 --> 00:09:04,950
wolfgang wieland: Different totally different communities and open up a way to think about common problems in different realizations of quantum gravity and.

46
00:09:06,450 --> 00:09:24,690
wolfgang wieland: This is very exciting Now the question is, or the task is to understand how gravity coppers to boundaries now, this is a bit of a maybe not a very clear terminology, but the idea is to.

47
00:09:25,530 --> 00:09:40,650
wolfgang wieland: describe simply boundaries in in the gravitation and framework, but these boundaries are themselves not material systems, so they are not like wires or mirrors their dad just.

48
00:09:43,140 --> 00:09:46,770
wolfgang wieland: Many folks that we introduce to isolate.

49
00:09:48,150 --> 00:09:56,490
wolfgang wieland: gravitation subsystems and that requires to introduce some sort of boundary but this boundary has no material.

50
00:09:58,260 --> 00:10:03,870
wolfgang wieland: presence, so to say, I mean that if we think that way, it is actually.

51
00:10:05,160 --> 00:10:24,180
wolfgang wieland: quite natural to formulate gravity as a theory theory formulated in terms of differential forms, rather than tenses so to work with frame fields and connections, rather than metric variables, the reason for that is that in the.

52
00:10:25,200 --> 00:10:30,030
wolfgang wieland: In in terms of differential forms, there is a more primitive notion of.

53
00:10:31,050 --> 00:10:38,280
wolfgang wieland: Of projection, namely the pullback which does not require any metric structure so it's more more.

54
00:10:40,590 --> 00:10:45,570
wolfgang wieland: yeah it's a more primitive notion of defining what is intrinsic to a boundary.

55
00:10:47,070 --> 00:10:52,500
wolfgang wieland: And if we formulate gravity in terms of differential forms, this is all very.

56
00:10:53,190 --> 00:11:14,700
wolfgang wieland: familiar to us, then the configuration variables are the ultimate frame the diagonal license the metric and the notion of parallel transport, then the action is just the usual Palestinian action, which is the field field strength of the connection contracted with directed area.

57
00:11:15,780 --> 00:11:25,590
wolfgang wieland: To form so five extra value to phone, which is the urbanski to form to impose boundary conditions and make the action.

58
00:11:28,200 --> 00:11:34,140
wolfgang wieland: Different variation of principle well defined, we may need to impose additional boundary terms.

59
00:11:34,500 --> 00:11:49,980
wolfgang wieland: That then show up as corner terms in the simplistic potential complexity potential for the polar teeny action just tells us that the connection is economically conjugate to this to fall at the kinematic level.

60
00:11:51,780 --> 00:11:58,230
wolfgang wieland: And then, what, what are the charges engage cemeteries in well, since we are now working.

61
00:11:59,700 --> 00:12:01,440
wolfgang wieland: With frame fields, rather than.

62
00:12:02,700 --> 00:12:14,370
wolfgang wieland: metrics variables, we have one additional gauge symmetry, namely internal Lawrence transformations that act by rotation on this tensor indices, and the.

63
00:12:15,630 --> 00:12:16,800
wolfgang wieland: Lawrence connection.

64
00:12:17,850 --> 00:12:28,410
wolfgang wieland: it's been connection transforms accordingly by a degree of it, and what one then finds is that there are additional launch charges that are.

65
00:12:29,820 --> 00:12:33,540
wolfgang wieland: generators of the H symmetry so more.

66
00:12:34,980 --> 00:12:45,150
wolfgang wieland: More precisely, any swore such launch transformation is indeed a gauge cemetery, which means that it is the general direction of the.

67
00:12:45,870 --> 00:13:01,710
wolfgang wieland: Press and elected to form on share, but a large cage transformation, so a large such internal lauren's transformation is not against transformation, it is actually a physical server that is generated by this.

68
00:13:03,990 --> 00:13:08,430
wolfgang wieland: observer, which is the electric flux through the boundary.

69
00:13:09,810 --> 00:13:26,760
wolfgang wieland: And in fact this quantity, has also been studied previously or long time ago by people interested in defining class a local spin off the gravitational field, for instance, I think your name.

70
00:13:27,540 --> 00:13:48,060
wolfgang wieland: On such references Branson who introduced such fluxus as the notion of the internal spin or angular momentum of space time and that already hinted an important point, namely that, without any.

71
00:13:49,110 --> 00:13:51,900
wolfgang wieland: Community group degrees of freedom, it is kind of.

72
00:13:53,790 --> 00:14:00,210
wolfgang wieland: unnatural or not not back here what is there a physical significance of these charges and.

73
00:14:01,230 --> 00:14:04,200
wolfgang wieland: In from out from the perspective of our.

74
00:14:06,210 --> 00:14:09,540
wolfgang wieland: Community has been some recent interest in this.

75
00:14:11,280 --> 00:14:16,500
wolfgang wieland: In these charges by Mark and and I adore and.

76
00:14:17,640 --> 00:14:20,760
Many other and the people I must say and.

77
00:14:22,530 --> 00:14:28,860
wolfgang wieland: More importantly, because the, these are the charges, corresponding to.

78
00:14:30,840 --> 00:14:52,800
wolfgang wieland: To angular momentum linear momentum Center of mass of course the different offices that act on the fundamental fields on the fundamental configuration variables by the derivative Mathematically speaking it's actually the derivative lifted upwards into the Lawrence on which says that.

79
00:14:54,030 --> 00:14:57,690
wolfgang wieland: A leader narrative of the connection is basically the.

80
00:14:58,800 --> 00:15:00,870
wolfgang wieland: field strength contracted with.

81
00:15:03,780 --> 00:15:23,430
wolfgang wieland: With the vector field that generates different models and then and now you can ask an important question so in saying in in general relativity if you move isms are gauged symmetries but the lesson from any gauge theory is that.

82
00:15:24,480 --> 00:15:40,440
wolfgang wieland: gage symmetries have charges and sort of question is, what are the charges for these different systems and if you're not take this inflected to phone and ask whether it is hamiltonian whether it is a charge.

83
00:15:42,090 --> 00:15:52,830
wolfgang wieland: That generates these different systems, then the question boils down to whether this expression has his differentiator, but it has a general.

84
00:15:54,210 --> 00:16:17,400
wolfgang wieland: And in fact at the linear is lever, this is truly fulfilled, because this action becomes linear and, once it is linear you can truly integrated and indeed you find the charge and you also find that once you evaluate this charge it space like infinity for an astral particular flat.

85
00:16:18,450 --> 00:16:39,330
wolfgang wieland: Space time where perturbation is points off like one of them are then indeed you obtain the usual conquer a charges, you have a pain, for instance, if sigh is an awesome topic and translation that Piques I is just a mass.

86
00:16:40,590 --> 00:16:42,600
wolfgang wieland: So now, this sounds very.

87
00:16:43,770 --> 00:16:44,640
wolfgang wieland: neat and.

88
00:16:45,720 --> 00:17:09,000
wolfgang wieland: interesting, but now passes a piece appears and what and the person that appears is that that that the side of interaction of gravity with itself actually spines the integral ability that for Agenda, or more precisely for.

89
00:17:10,830 --> 00:17:12,690
wolfgang wieland: If you asked for that such an.

90
00:17:13,800 --> 00:17:26,610
wolfgang wieland: generator exists for finite region, then you find that there isn't not any longer such charge existing so let me go a bit through this argument because it's very simple.

91
00:17:27,570 --> 00:17:38,640
wolfgang wieland: So in gravity, we know that if you malfeasance our pH symmetries small differential isms of each cemeteries and therefore we.

92
00:17:39,750 --> 00:17:56,880
wolfgang wieland: may assume that, if we restrict the hamiltonian formulation to a finite region that then to we can assign a generator to such a time, translation and if we.

93
00:17:58,710 --> 00:18:01,500
wolfgang wieland: take into account water but i've said previously.

94
00:18:02,520 --> 00:18:09,300
wolfgang wieland: We were you find that this generator can only be surface charge.

95
00:18:10,410 --> 00:18:12,060
wolfgang wieland: boundary term you can ask.

96
00:18:13,140 --> 00:18:15,810
wolfgang wieland: Well, is there now, you can run.

97
00:18:16,860 --> 00:18:30,630
wolfgang wieland: audit, the question is better something like Robert it's true, and if it is true, then you would say that this hamiltonian that generates the evolution along the boundary.

98
00:18:31,800 --> 00:18:47,460
wolfgang wieland: has actually is actually Mediterranean and that there is some stress energy pencil for some boundary field theory that generates this evolution, but now we can ask is this actually is best is actually.

99
00:18:48,570 --> 00:18:50,910
wolfgang wieland: Under which conditions can this be true.

100
00:18:52,350 --> 00:19:08,880
wolfgang wieland: And when we also know that any such generator must fulfill since the underlying symmetry is if your mouth is symmetry that we should have some.

101
00:19:10,830 --> 00:19:12,450
wolfgang wieland: representation of.

102
00:19:14,700 --> 00:19:18,030
wolfgang wieland: dpm off isn't symmetry algebra on Facebook.

103
00:19:19,290 --> 00:19:21,000
wolfgang wieland: Perhaps with us, yes.

104
00:19:22,320 --> 00:19:25,260
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Oh very base level what what what Facebook of.

105
00:19:26,820 --> 00:19:29,070
wolfgang wieland: i'm talking about the covariance a space yes.

106
00:19:29,580 --> 00:19:29,820
Okay.

107
00:19:31,050 --> 00:19:35,940
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: But then the simplistic structures, has a lot of digital resources so that we are taking that into account also.

108
00:19:38,250 --> 00:19:43,470
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Inspired Facebook doesn't have a I mean the gauge directions, are all in the current political structure.

109
00:19:44,040 --> 00:19:44,880
wolfgang wieland: that's right yes.

110
00:19:45,390 --> 00:19:49,980
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So, so you have to worry about the degeneracy is also in this thing that us, I mean the hamiltonian.

111
00:19:51,690 --> 00:19:52,050
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Yes.

112
00:19:54,630 --> 00:19:54,960
wolfgang wieland: Yes.

113
00:19:55,110 --> 00:20:00,600
wolfgang wieland: Yes, that's correct and what what so in this kind of.

114
00:20:03,240 --> 00:20:06,480
wolfgang wieland: motivation and argument in here and here.

115
00:20:08,520 --> 00:20:09,630
wolfgang wieland: The question is what.

116
00:20:12,360 --> 00:20:21,720
wolfgang wieland: What what face face can be assigned to to find that region, so if I separate the degrees of freedom on to such a cushy partially cushy hyperspace.

117
00:20:22,320 --> 00:20:37,530
wolfgang wieland: And then indeed the JET then, then the simplex extract pressing likely to form on the cover and face space has huge too generous as you're saying, in fact, any small give you more of isn't.

118
00:20:38,370 --> 00:20:47,070
wolfgang wieland: That is of compact support on this on this partially cushy hyper surface is the general direction.

119
00:20:47,550 --> 00:21:02,940
wolfgang wieland: But for find it from officer, which is to say a few more isn't that doesn't vanish or which is generated by vector field that doesn't Jana doesn't vanish you at the boundary you find that this is not a.

120
00:21:04,350 --> 00:21:09,990
wolfgang wieland: gauge cemetery so you can ask yourself, is there is there hamiltonian for such a.

121
00:21:11,310 --> 00:21:24,900
wolfgang wieland: For such a few more ISM and is that and this hamiltonian can only be a charge, it can only be a surface and deliver over the boundary but then you also let us also assume that.

122
00:21:26,190 --> 00:21:33,390
wolfgang wieland: That different office manager Brian satisfied, so that you get that the add on the covariance face space.

123
00:21:34,200 --> 00:21:54,990
wolfgang wieland: If you find that persona brackets that these generators satisfy some algebra perhaps with some central charge, but now this viewpoint, is it ought, it is at odds with the fact that a system may lose energy by a gravitational radiation.

124
00:21:56,280 --> 00:21:58,140
wolfgang wieland: And the argument.

125
00:21:59,370 --> 00:22:06,060
wolfgang wieland: They have a realistic argument is as follows, so let's assume that this generator actually is energy.

126
00:22:07,020 --> 00:22:23,730
wolfgang wieland: Energy, as mentioned, for instance, at an infinity but now brought brought into final distance, then we can ask what it is, what is it was what is its time evolution well time evolution is generated by.

127
00:22:25,080 --> 00:22:28,170
wolfgang wieland: By a vector field and we just.

128
00:22:29,550 --> 00:22:46,230
wolfgang wieland: assume that there that this vector field is integral rubber on combined face space, such that we can use it's generated so replace God T by the hamiltonian but then whatever appears in here, in this first line is.

129
00:22:47,610 --> 00:22:55,350
wolfgang wieland: Because the lead the derivative of a vector field with its have manages this just this must be conserved.

130
00:22:56,550 --> 00:23:03,450
wolfgang wieland: But this is a at odds with the very simple observation that energy is predicted the rain.

131
00:23:04,560 --> 00:23:18,270
wolfgang wieland: And if if we think of discharge being located at infinity then indeed it should just be that the mass of the system and the energy loss should be just.

132
00:23:19,440 --> 00:23:33,270
wolfgang wieland: The bondi you should be just getting by the body mass forward and therefore these two equations are at odds with this viewpoint there's something wrong about this viewpoint, and I think one.

133
00:23:34,680 --> 00:23:38,760
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: And now there's nothing wrong with that the point, because if you just take four Sigma with your.

134
00:23:39,270 --> 00:23:41,610
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Real coaches surface, which is the past one.

135
00:23:42,930 --> 00:23:46,710
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Then, and that is that there's a total energy and that energy is concert.

136
00:23:48,210 --> 00:23:51,960
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Right, so I think if you, the problem is that you are.

137
00:23:54,510 --> 00:23:56,760
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Having the cake and eating it dude you're trying to say that.

138
00:23:58,500 --> 00:24:03,150
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: The Sigma can be anything any cross section.

139
00:24:04,650 --> 00:24:09,060
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: And still, it should be the hamiltonian and then it doesn't come up with itself, I mean.

140
00:24:10,440 --> 00:24:14,160
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: In other words, your your your first equation, the slide.

141
00:24:15,270 --> 00:24:23,940
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: If you stick stick to anything you want that, of course, is incorrect, but if you take Sigma to be the kosher surface for that little region, then it is correct.

142
00:24:24,360 --> 00:24:35,760
wolfgang wieland: That is correct, of course, there is nothing wrong about it, and then you don't get this is this maslow's formula, because you always located at and I not at.

143
00:24:35,850 --> 00:24:40,050
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: No, no, no, you get mass loss by the law because.

144
00:24:41,310 --> 00:24:51,540
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Because I mean what you get conservation law which says that the the bottom integral is equal to the integral through the through the null surface, plus the top integrity and that is a conservation law.

145
00:24:52,140 --> 00:25:03,030
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: And then the bondi energy, if you like, the local version of the body energy would be the one that is evaluated the top service and I just don't understand, we were noticing, so why are we discussing.

146
00:25:05,220 --> 00:25:06,000
wolfgang wieland: So we are these.

147
00:25:07,560 --> 00:25:08,940
Be because I.

148
00:25:13,470 --> 00:25:16,350
wolfgang wieland: want I want precisely a framework that is MOD.

149
00:25:17,370 --> 00:25:26,100
wolfgang wieland: That allows me to to study an arbitrary cushy hyperspace to to to study us to study.

150
00:25:28,440 --> 00:25:40,770
wolfgang wieland: A tree surface that that is not cushy that ends up that can intersect a cross section at it's quite Plus, for instance, and this is.

151
00:25:41,910 --> 00:25:50,760
wolfgang wieland: And to clarify this is also the same viewpoint that appears on an isolate that reason because there we have.

152
00:25:51,990 --> 00:25:55,800
wolfgang wieland: We have we have a similar setup there as well.

153
00:25:57,780 --> 00:26:20,550
wolfgang wieland: The separate degrees of freedom inside the black hole or inside the isolated horizon from those that sit outside, so we are in a in a framework where we are considering partially cushy hyper surface three surface that intersects an isolated horizon and we asked is the hamiltonian that.

154
00:26:21,930 --> 00:26:23,820
wolfgang wieland: generates evolution along that.

155
00:26:25,440 --> 00:26:28,620
wolfgang wieland: That brings us from one cross section to the next.

156
00:26:29,850 --> 00:26:36,870
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: I said I mean, for example, you know long time ago, many years ago, before even the work of war that was in the.

157
00:26:38,010 --> 00:26:41,550
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: In the in the chat bar just now Bob Bailey.

158
00:26:43,980 --> 00:26:54,960
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Royal line I have done this course, you have this formulation exactly for the bottom, being a Porsche surface the top being a cross section of scribe and we showed that there is.

159
00:26:55,620 --> 00:26:58,020
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: it's completely consistent Korean face face.

160
00:26:58,170 --> 00:27:01,740
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: In fact, you get the bond the last last last formula right.

161
00:27:04,440 --> 00:27:05,250
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: We mean.

162
00:27:07,170 --> 00:27:08,940
wolfgang wieland: The question is, for this down the line.

163
00:27:13,620 --> 00:27:14,370
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Which is.

164
00:27:15,840 --> 00:27:18,270
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: The the the time translation of activity.

165
00:27:19,620 --> 00:27:20,040
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Is the.

166
00:27:21,750 --> 00:27:23,580
wolfgang wieland: One, the question is what is.

167
00:27:25,170 --> 00:27:26,310
wolfgang wieland: What is the role of.

168
00:27:27,930 --> 00:27:30,810
wolfgang wieland: Of Sigma on that Facebook, so what was.

169
00:27:30,960 --> 00:27:32,970
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: You sick sick sick that the future Sigma.

170
00:27:33,420 --> 00:27:34,950
wolfgang wieland: And then sort of flux.

171
00:27:36,000 --> 00:27:37,860
wolfgang wieland: Some or not let's say.

172
00:27:38,910 --> 00:27:48,240
wolfgang wieland: And what i'm but maybe this will become clear in the in the next slide what i'm what I want to argue for is that.

173
00:27:49,800 --> 00:27:51,120
wolfgang wieland: We can indeed.

174
00:27:53,280 --> 00:28:07,110
wolfgang wieland: Think of hamiltonian framework where we can put any flux it crosses the narrow hyper surface, but then we have to treat it differently if you have to view it as some.

175
00:28:07,980 --> 00:28:17,310
wolfgang wieland: Not part of, then we have to work on as smaller facebook's, we have to work on this pace pace, but the outgoing flux, is just PICs.

176
00:28:17,700 --> 00:28:35,670
wolfgang wieland: So it's not it's not a cue number, so to say it's not a face space number, it is a, it is a background fee, and then the question is, are there is there still a space that evolves for that given background fields.

177
00:28:36,870 --> 00:28:50,310
wolfgang wieland: And that's what I would like to to other that's the viewpoint, I would like to to advocate for that we can have a hamiltonian that brings us from one.

178
00:28:51,120 --> 00:29:10,800
wolfgang wieland: Such cross section to the next, but it operates on a base smaller pace pace in fact it operates on a pace space that is only the face space of these boundary modes alone we're already at theta has now been.

179
00:29:11,910 --> 00:29:16,740
wolfgang wieland: encoded into into this out silly repeats.

180
00:29:18,420 --> 00:29:18,750
wolfgang wieland: and

181
00:29:19,380 --> 00:29:20,490
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Bad but you're not forced.

182
00:29:20,640 --> 00:29:22,920
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: To that is what i'm saying I mean that's I mean.

183
00:29:23,010 --> 00:29:25,860
wolfgang wieland: that's another famous precisely precisely i'm.

184
00:29:26,190 --> 00:29:36,510
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So, so that we can just say let's make that choice because the way that he was presenting it, is that there is some contradiction if you are going to go away and face space in that space time reason i'm saying there's no contradiction.

185
00:29:38,400 --> 00:29:50,130
wolfgang wieland: Right, there is no, there is a contradiction a few, if you want, in a way too much, and you, but you can have that if you if you drop another um.

186
00:29:52,680 --> 00:29:54,600
wolfgang wieland: If you abandoned and another.

187
00:29:55,680 --> 00:29:59,040
wolfgang wieland: If you treat certain kind of variables differently.

188
00:30:00,510 --> 00:30:03,330
wolfgang wieland: So I think we are, we are not.

189
00:30:05,910 --> 00:30:06,570
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Okay, good.

190
00:30:06,810 --> 00:30:08,280
wolfgang wieland: yeah let me, let me go ahead.

191
00:30:09,810 --> 00:30:10,710
wolfgang wieland: So let let's.

192
00:30:11,850 --> 00:30:15,810
wolfgang wieland: was, in my opinion, what lies at the.

193
00:30:17,130 --> 00:30:25,260
wolfgang wieland: At the heart of the problem is, is that in the combined face based approach we we don't.

194
00:30:26,760 --> 00:30:40,680
wolfgang wieland: It is somewhat different difficult or not immediate two separate faith based degrees of freedom from backgrounds feeds or put in other ways to separate Q numbers from.

195
00:30:41,910 --> 00:30:58,980
wolfgang wieland: From see numbers or pete configurations from from p's and q's on face bates, and this can be illustrated so this program can be illustrated by the following extremely simple time model so consider.

196
00:31:01,530 --> 00:31:16,200
wolfgang wieland: A large system, so a system and its environment, and it is completely hamiltonian so all the degrees of freedom are just encoded in some p's and q's that evolve a court, according to a large hamiltonian.

197
00:31:16,620 --> 00:31:29,820
wolfgang wieland: But now let's suppose that we are only interested in in a subsystem and the subsystem is governed by the following action it has some p's and q's so face face.

198
00:31:31,260 --> 00:31:47,700
wolfgang wieland: can only two potential minus syntactic structure some pre hamiltonian and, in addition to that, and interaction term that tells us how the system degrees of freedom interact with the environment, now.

199
00:31:48,600 --> 00:32:02,430
wolfgang wieland: The whole system system and the environment if or by a large hamiltonian but if be separate the system from the Environment some degrees of freedom, have to be prescribed by the external.

200
00:32:03,000 --> 00:32:10,200
wolfgang wieland: system and I encode them into these fields on the guy of tea, which are called background fields.

201
00:32:11,250 --> 00:32:15,000
wolfgang wieland: You can think of them as for instance the length of.

202
00:32:15,960 --> 00:32:26,400
wolfgang wieland: pendulum or the strength of a harmonic oscillator whatever in the large face face all these degrees of freedom are hamiltonian, but if you separate them.

203
00:32:26,700 --> 00:32:36,120
wolfgang wieland: be prescribed some degrees of freedom as external variables these external variables can be tuned by the experimenter.

204
00:32:36,570 --> 00:32:49,830
wolfgang wieland: By by turning some notes and drops, and so there is an explicit time dependents now what his face face face face in this prescription is just our p's and q's that.

205
00:32:50,250 --> 00:33:06,300
wolfgang wieland: satisfy the hamiltonian equations for given back France fields Omega I have T, however, the space of the six weeks is larger than that it contains all possible configurations of omega of T.

206
00:33:07,350 --> 00:33:19,380
wolfgang wieland: So the space of physically histories, is the Union the discharge Union of all face basis for all possible configurations of omega of tea.

207
00:33:20,160 --> 00:33:31,650
wolfgang wieland: And now in in this time model, everything is kind of obvious we know what his face face, we know bodies, the hamiltonian and we know what our back from fields.

208
00:33:31,980 --> 00:33:44,940
wolfgang wieland: In general relativity, on the other hand, behind the situation where this separation is not immediate, in fact, it is sometimes we sometimes don't know the hamiltonian at just at hand.

209
00:33:46,440 --> 00:33:54,180
wolfgang wieland: And the combined faith based approach is a very elegant way to infer the hamiltonian from the from the action.

210
00:33:55,440 --> 00:34:10,560
wolfgang wieland: However, they cover and paste This approach does not directly operate on tastebuds it operates under space of our solutions to the field, the patients to our possible boundary conditions.

211
00:34:13,980 --> 00:34:24,840
wolfgang wieland: instance in and with better say compatible with an awesome particularly flats based on but, in doing so, but if he if he can then do the same.

212
00:34:26,040 --> 00:34:45,660
wolfgang wieland: If he then apply the same viewpoint today that program we run into the following issue in, so let us so we know that what is the hamiltonian in this framework it's just a free hamiltonian plus this interaction term and now consider a general variation on.

213
00:34:46,710 --> 00:34:57,870
wolfgang wieland: On face to face, in other words at on this excuse me, I said something wrong let's consider a general variation in other words a tangent vector.

214
00:34:58,170 --> 00:35:19,830
wolfgang wieland: On the space of physical histories, a tangent backdrop on this space of physical histories, is an infinitesimal variation of the p's and q's and omega and now the variation of the hamiltonian which we know because it's just a pre hamiltonian plus the interaction hamiltonian is.

215
00:35:21,600 --> 00:35:34,200
wolfgang wieland: contains two terms it contains a simplistic term that takes care of the dependence of the hamiltonian with respect to the p's and q's but it contains an additional term that.

216
00:35:35,370 --> 00:35:48,090
wolfgang wieland: takes into account the dependence of the hamiltonian on the background fields, and so one may not be mistaken to believe that the hamiltonian is not integral over.

217
00:35:49,140 --> 00:36:03,510
wolfgang wieland: Because there's always this additional term but this non integral ability, just to reflect the pack the simple fact that the hamiltonian is explicitly time dependence that the explicit time dependence is.

218
00:36:04,800 --> 00:36:17,340
wolfgang wieland: Is induced by this explicitly time dependent extra fields, in fact, if this top Now you can evaluate this equation, for a very particular.

219
00:36:17,670 --> 00:36:33,180
wolfgang wieland: tangent vector on the space of physical histories, namely that time evolution itself, then the first term vanishes but the section term gives you something, namely gives you the time dependence of the hamiltonian.

220
00:36:34,290 --> 00:36:56,730
wolfgang wieland: They explain it so if, in other words, if you replace he a delta idea with et system those have a and your pain, the equation, the governance, the time dependence of the hamiltonian and this equation just assume that the time the pendants is driven by this time dependent veterans.

221
00:36:57,840 --> 00:37:08,460
wolfgang wieland: And now the the viewpoint is to ask how that this can be applied to to gravity so.

222
00:37:11,460 --> 00:37:12,000
Excuse me.

223
00:37:13,290 --> 00:37:23,880
wolfgang wieland: So the what we have to ask ourselves ourselves now is how to how to separate the environment from them.

224
00:37:26,880 --> 00:37:37,380
wolfgang wieland: From the system to be started and in the current context to characterize gravitation is subsystem two choices must be made.

225
00:37:38,730 --> 00:37:49,710
wolfgang wieland: first choice is is is one could say top logic, so you start out with the partial cushy hyper surface Sigma and now you have to.

226
00:37:50,910 --> 00:37:54,090
wolfgang wieland: To give a prescription for how to extend this.

227
00:37:55,110 --> 00:38:06,870
wolfgang wieland: This partially cushy hyper surface into a virtue in space time into a region of space and the infinitely many possibilities for how to do that.

228
00:38:07,290 --> 00:38:26,310
wolfgang wieland: And, for instance, you can say that this hyper surface should be time like or minimal surface extremely surface or this surface of consuming curvature etc in following the are interested in the case where the surface is not.

229
00:38:27,660 --> 00:38:40,650
wolfgang wieland: In addition to this first choice is first choice which is topological a second choice must be made, namely, what are the degrees of freedom that live on this on this.

230
00:38:42,390 --> 00:38:52,050
wolfgang wieland: Narrow hyper surface, in other words, what are, what is the flux of gravitational radiation that goes out, and if you have these two choices, you can.

231
00:38:55,260 --> 00:39:07,200
wolfgang wieland: evolve these degrees of freedom or you can evolve you, you find a hamiltonian that evolves the boundary data along the cylinder.

232
00:39:08,040 --> 00:39:15,000
wolfgang wieland: The question of course is the hamiltonian for which face, please, what are the degrees of freedom that invoice under this Hamilton.

233
00:39:15,630 --> 00:39:31,920
wolfgang wieland: And the hint is given by our what we know from Laura mentions in fact in dimensions smaller than four there are no reputation and base to begin, so we can completely forget about that program yet.

234
00:39:32,940 --> 00:39:45,420
wolfgang wieland: We still find charges, we still find a boundary filtering, in fact, if we separate degrees of freedom in the outside, from the degrees of freedom in the inside.

235
00:39:45,870 --> 00:40:01,020
wolfgang wieland: For instance, if you work with in the transactions formulation of gravity you'll find some confirm or you can choose boundary conditions, such that you end up with a consumer field TV at the boundary that evolves.

236
00:40:01,980 --> 00:40:13,860
wolfgang wieland: The remaining degrees of freedom along this along this boundary for which you have to give you a prescription how this boundary is embedded into space time.

237
00:40:14,400 --> 00:40:26,640
wolfgang wieland: And what are these these degrees of freedom that live at the boundary well, they cannot be happy tones because in order mentioned Stan or cartoons, to begin with, they are just this.

238
00:40:28,950 --> 00:40:46,290
wolfgang wieland: boundary degrees of freedom or these animals that lift that are only located at the Cross sections at the corners of these space time regions and the question is whether something similar can be done in higher dimensions and.

239
00:40:48,960 --> 00:40:52,470
wolfgang wieland: You pointed out, I like to advocate in this talk.

240
00:40:52,530 --> 00:40:52,860
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Is.

241
00:40:53,130 --> 00:40:59,790
wolfgang wieland: that yes, this can be done, but then this hamiltonian that generates this evolution is.

242
00:41:02,610 --> 00:41:11,880
wolfgang wieland: It depends parametric Kelly on the in or outgoing flux and that then drives the explicit time dependence of the hamiltonian.

243
00:41:14,070 --> 00:41:18,180
wolfgang wieland: So, and now the question is how to to set the.

244
00:41:19,890 --> 00:41:20,640
Stage question.

245
00:41:23,520 --> 00:41:26,880
wolfgang wieland: So now, the question is how how to set up the problem.

246
00:41:27,510 --> 00:41:28,140
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: How to.

247
00:41:29,220 --> 00:41:30,660
wolfgang wieland: choose the surfaces.

248
00:41:31,980 --> 00:41:45,510
wolfgang wieland: Now, in other words, am interested in setting up a debris knife radiation or to choose surfaces in space time that abandoned by not hyper surfaces and then take the limit.

249
00:41:46,650 --> 00:42:01,680
wolfgang wieland: To to infinity in order to see better this framework is consistent with what we have introduced or what we have learned so far by by all the previous work so.

250
00:42:03,210 --> 00:42:08,160
wolfgang wieland: most commonly in the literature, the following gauge choices are being made.

251
00:42:09,360 --> 00:42:19,530
wolfgang wieland: So these are the, these are the standard Newman panels or this is john standard bondi coordinate system, so one works with.

252
00:42:21,030 --> 00:42:39,960
wolfgang wieland: Not affiliation, but now the outgoing not hyper surfaces I integral over and the human painters not Tetra introduced which is parallel Lee transported along these outgoing non directions.

253
00:42:41,160 --> 00:42:50,130
wolfgang wieland: The retarded time coordinate you select this ubiquity constant blue hyper surfaces, which are not.

254
00:42:51,930 --> 00:42:52,740
wolfgang wieland: In addition.

255
00:42:53,850 --> 00:42:59,310
wolfgang wieland: They are they going now directions which are, however, not surface orthogonal.

256
00:43:00,570 --> 00:43:06,330
wolfgang wieland: Instead, a there are other it constant hyper surfaces, which are usually timeline.

257
00:43:07,920 --> 00:43:08,610
wolfgang wieland: And this.

258
00:43:09,690 --> 00:43:34,380
wolfgang wieland: cage choice is somewhat is advanced disadvantages for our purpose, because we want to assign a face space, so we want to characterize the outgoing no direction at at not hyper surfaces that can record this radiation and therefore we want to have the blue that excuse me that read.

259
00:43:35,880 --> 00:43:50,850
wolfgang wieland: This read surfaces to be non surfaces as well, so, in other words, we want to work with the debris not affiliation, of course, this will at some point, this coordinate system will at some point break down so we.

260
00:43:52,050 --> 00:43:55,170
wolfgang wieland: So what i'm doing in the paper is to restrict myself to.

261
00:43:56,220 --> 00:43:57,930
wolfgang wieland: To region where this.

262
00:43:59,040 --> 00:44:06,600
wolfgang wieland: person exists, basically, and now the idea is that the the radio coordinate is simply.

263
00:44:07,620 --> 00:44:22,230
wolfgang wieland: replaced by the inverse conform or factor and still days to retarded time coordinate who's youthful constant surfaces again So these are the outgoing knowledge surfaces, but both of these.

264
00:44:23,250 --> 00:44:31,590
wolfgang wieland: But now we have a doctrinal foundation now one of the coordinators, you and the other one is the inverse conformed factor.

265
00:44:32,850 --> 00:44:42,240
wolfgang wieland: and in doing so, some spin coefficients that have been previously said to CEO and i'll turned on.

266
00:44:43,020 --> 00:44:52,800
wolfgang wieland: And therefore we have to relax some other gauge choices which can now not any longer be imposed in the standard Newman and rose.

267
00:44:53,760 --> 00:45:07,770
wolfgang wieland: On the communism, in fact, what is what what is no no longer true is that the not attach what is purely transported along the outgoing i'm surfaces, so this condition is.

268
00:45:09,120 --> 00:45:09,660
wolfgang wieland: abandoned.

269
00:45:11,310 --> 00:45:26,280
wolfgang wieland: Instead, that in going now direction is now surface orthogonal so there's a gradient and this gradient so in going that direction is proportional to the gradient of all.

270
00:45:28,710 --> 00:45:32,130
wolfgang wieland: The only received room of the.

271
00:45:33,150 --> 00:45:50,610
wolfgang wieland: Previous page condition that says that the earliest age condition that says that is not Tetra is power really transported along the outgoing directions, is this you want beach condition basically sets select representative of the.

272
00:45:52,320 --> 00:45:55,140
wolfgang wieland: Extra fields M and N bar that are.

273
00:45:56,250 --> 00:46:01,710
wolfgang wieland: tangential to these 2d cross sections where they're going and outgoing non directional.

274
00:46:02,910 --> 00:46:15,810
wolfgang wieland: intersect and this such a dominant affiliation, is now more advantageous for purpose, because for every hole so for every value of the inverse conform or factor.

275
00:46:16,500 --> 00:46:41,610
wolfgang wieland: We now have such a region and we can ask what is the syntactic structure that we induce, for instance on the nikon but also on these casts on this partially cushy harper surfaces as inherited from the action from the action that we define in one such region.

276
00:46:43,170 --> 00:46:49,380
wolfgang wieland: By imposing appropriate boundary conditions, what is now Nice is that using this.

277
00:46:50,490 --> 00:47:08,730
wolfgang wieland: w not affiliation you end up basically with exactly the same full of conditions, as in the Newman Penrose in the as in the bondi gauge the only difference is that some spin coefficients that are otherwise set to zero have now.

278
00:47:10,500 --> 00:47:20,640
wolfgang wieland: known vanishing a non vanishing value but order so to St martin's been coefficients life, the expansion in going into their.

279
00:47:21,960 --> 00:47:28,770
wolfgang wieland: outgoing and ongoing expansion outgoing and in going cheer you don't have the same.

280
00:47:30,750 --> 00:47:31,680
wolfgang wieland: phone off as.

281
00:47:33,750 --> 00:47:38,400
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Just just to make sure that your rotation is opposite of newer Penrose like for you.

282
00:47:40,260 --> 00:47:42,360
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: What what you call K, is what they call.

283
00:47:43,620 --> 00:47:45,210
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: The what you call what they call it.

284
00:47:45,630 --> 00:47:47,280
wolfgang wieland: Yes, that is correct.

285
00:47:48,750 --> 00:47:50,490
wolfgang wieland: Yes, but it's.

286
00:47:51,690 --> 00:47:53,970
wolfgang wieland: Closer to work on the original us.

287
00:47:55,230 --> 00:47:56,610
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: that's perfectly fine, but so that.

288
00:47:57,510 --> 00:47:59,370
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Other people don't get confused about it so.

289
00:47:59,970 --> 00:48:11,310
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: When you say Sigma some key, that is what Newman Penrose what's called the sheer, and that is sequence of Allah and what you call Sigma suppan Allah is really what they're called segments of N, which is war, like the news OK.

290
00:48:11,850 --> 00:48:16,980
wolfgang wieland: that's fine, yes, you see, you can infer from this time derivative in here.

291
00:48:17,790 --> 00:48:24,060
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: and said that that Sigma you didn't like what that was it okay yeah good good Thank you yeah.

292
00:48:24,750 --> 00:48:27,630
wolfgang wieland: And, and also to speak there for for.

293
00:48:29,310 --> 00:48:29,940
wolfgang wieland: Various.

294
00:48:31,410 --> 00:48:32,160
wolfgang wieland: curvature.

295
00:48:37,980 --> 00:48:47,040
wolfgang wieland: The components of the buyers tend to have the same four of us in the standard numerous formulas which is my Nice and.

296
00:48:48,600 --> 00:48:52,500
wolfgang wieland: So this sets up the fall off for one particular.

297
00:48:53,610 --> 00:49:03,750
wolfgang wieland: solution of einstein's equation in this coordinate system this doesn't tell us yet about anything about Facebook Facebook is not about one.

298
00:49:04,860 --> 00:49:06,390
wolfgang wieland: Space time it's about.

299
00:49:07,950 --> 00:49:24,060
wolfgang wieland: Family of solutions of space time for given boundary conditions and the via in the following i'm studying the solutions of einstein's equations in in a finite region, in fact, in one of these.

300
00:49:25,320 --> 00:49:27,870
wolfgang wieland: Regions defined by this coordinate.

301
00:49:29,550 --> 00:49:31,680
wolfgang wieland: And the question is now how to set up the.

302
00:49:32,910 --> 00:49:38,610
wolfgang wieland: original principal how to set up the action, what is the what is the free space and so on.

303
00:49:40,320 --> 00:49:43,680
wolfgang wieland: And now, now we go back to.

304
00:49:45,300 --> 00:49:45,630
To.

305
00:49:47,160 --> 00:49:48,540
wolfgang wieland: To the face based formulation.

306
00:49:49,710 --> 00:49:57,480
wolfgang wieland: And to set up the boundary conditions, it is useful to study the structure of.

307
00:49:59,430 --> 00:50:12,690
wolfgang wieland: The fundamental configuration variables on this on and our hypothesis now in our approach in Luke quantum gravity that momentum conjugate to the connection is terrible urbanski to fall.

308
00:50:13,710 --> 00:50:27,240
wolfgang wieland: So we have to study how this this if you decompose it into it served well and antisense two parts, how this parameter prizes or how this just looks on the null hypothesis.

309
00:50:28,080 --> 00:50:50,250
wolfgang wieland: And what is nice is and i've no i've spoken about that already many times is that the poor back of the pound key to form to dinner surface has a very simple algebraic structure, it is in fact now these fields are intrinsic to the north boundary the symmetry 10s of product of a spinner.

310
00:50:51,330 --> 00:50:52,140
wolfgang wieland: which I call l.

311
00:50:53,340 --> 00:50:59,610
wolfgang wieland: For the same reason, I call the knowledge generators L and SP no value to fall.

312
00:51:01,050 --> 00:51:14,130
wolfgang wieland: And the role of this spinner la is, it is just a national flag to the associated to this new direction so, in other words, if we take a bar.

313
00:51:15,270 --> 00:51:33,150
wolfgang wieland: In the Newman Penrose formalism this corresponds to another vector and this novel vector is tangential to the nine race that generate is not a surface furthermore be can construct so all these fields are now charged on very sad to see.

314
00:51:34,470 --> 00:51:44,550
wolfgang wieland: But since days the SL to see invariant epsilon tensor we can contract these to spin out spinner indices, and we get something that.

315
00:51:46,860 --> 00:52:02,040
wolfgang wieland: defines is kayla and I said to see, so this is the geometrics kayla it lives on this not hyper surfaces, and it has a geometric meaning, it is simply the area area to form the oriented area on this.

316
00:52:03,570 --> 00:52:17,070
wolfgang wieland: On this not hyper surface I say oriented area, because this can be both positive and negative corresponding to a different choice of orientation, while the metrical area is always.

317
00:52:18,090 --> 00:52:23,370
wolfgang wieland: Positive so it's the difference between the density and the and the differential for.

318
00:52:24,990 --> 00:52:27,210
wolfgang wieland: And now, what is the.

319
00:52:28,350 --> 00:52:28,890
wolfgang wieland: Now we.

320
00:52:30,120 --> 00:52:37,170
wolfgang wieland: Are additional principle, so we have to actually in the interior and the bark in the inside, these.

321
00:52:39,210 --> 00:52:46,170
wolfgang wieland: These cones but now we have to add a boundary term on this night hyper services is red.

322
00:52:47,220 --> 00:52:47,970
wolfgang wieland: regions.

323
00:52:49,260 --> 00:53:04,200
wolfgang wieland: And what is nice is that from these boundary fields, one can construct about there is an obvious choice for boundary term, which is just the derivative of the spinner contracted with to form eater.

324
00:53:05,700 --> 00:53:16,200
wolfgang wieland: And one has to add, however, an additional one form that is pounder that is intrinsic to the boundary which encodes them.

325
00:53:17,340 --> 00:53:32,550
wolfgang wieland: The rescaling freedom, you have in the novel directions, and this is a connection that is intrinsic to the normal hyper surface now, the question then arises, what should we choose for this.

326
00:53:34,320 --> 00:53:47,940
wolfgang wieland: One form, and this will be chosen by the boundary conditions that I will specify the next slide now the words on the not hyper surface, we have to impose.

327
00:53:49,050 --> 00:54:01,740
wolfgang wieland: So the combined action is now the some of the action in the interior plus this boundary and now we have to now, I have to tell you what are the boundary conditions under which does action is to be.

328
00:54:02,760 --> 00:54:21,690
wolfgang wieland: Extra month and on the the boundary conditions are as follows, in fact, basic idea is that along the not hyper surface the boundary conditions should only fix two degrees of freedom point which is of course the gravity.

329
00:54:22,770 --> 00:54:23,910
wolfgang wieland: gravity monster.

330
00:54:25,200 --> 00:54:40,020
wolfgang wieland: This just the gravitational radiation, it needs to be fixed but we don't want to eat any more of that and the way to do that is to say that and get equivalence class of boundary fields is kept fixed at the boundary.

331
00:54:41,250 --> 00:54:41,910
wolfgang wieland: How is this.

332
00:54:43,230 --> 00:54:59,550
wolfgang wieland: And this case, your equivalent class is defined by an equivalence relation, so any there the equivalence class or the boundary fields consists of the knowledge generators and I keep the.

333
00:55:01,110 --> 00:55:17,400
wolfgang wieland: The direction of the novel race fixed So these are seen as an as a university strong structure shared among different space times so bodies shared is the direction of L but not it's not it's.

334
00:55:18,570 --> 00:55:20,100
wolfgang wieland: A feature length, so to say.

335
00:55:21,150 --> 00:55:21,810
wolfgang wieland: In addition.

336
00:55:23,310 --> 00:55:35,190
wolfgang wieland: there's the one from copper that defines the non affinity and then these diets em and then bar that defined intrinsic metric on the 900.

337
00:55:35,850 --> 00:55:55,590
wolfgang wieland: And now we have to induce or now, I have to say that I have to specify this equivalence relation and to configurations are said trivalent if they are related by a different, more isn't it is vertical not worth it from office, and that is generated by.

338
00:55:56,730 --> 00:56:01,920
wolfgang wieland: baxter field that is not on the novel hyper surfers then that the locations.

339
00:56:03,450 --> 00:56:04,440
wolfgang wieland: Complex unified.

340
00:56:05,610 --> 00:56:26,880
wolfgang wieland: and former transformations and shifts of this one from CAFE the basically is basically tells you that the only component that matters of copper a of that one form is the one that defines the non affinity acceleration which and then you can easily if you do the accounting.

341
00:56:28,710 --> 00:56:29,220
Then.

342
00:56:30,780 --> 00:56:34,470
wolfgang wieland: You learn that this this.

343
00:56:35,700 --> 00:56:48,570
wolfgang wieland: Equivalence class is characterized by two degrees of freedom point which are the two degrees of freedom of gravitational radiation crossing the non episodes.

344
00:56:49,710 --> 00:56:50,190
wolfgang wieland: Now.

345
00:56:51,900 --> 00:56:58,890
wolfgang wieland: An interesting question, and this is going into the direction that i'm.

346
00:57:00,150 --> 00:57:11,370
wolfgang wieland: Working on now is how the mercy parameter affects the structure and also changes the boundary conditions in fact in there.

347
00:57:13,560 --> 00:57:34,830
wolfgang wieland: In terms of sex to a variable is it's very easy to introduce the mercy parameter just replace you just add a complex value coupling constant to the self to an action and take the real power of of the entire expression and that defines the party or host action.

348
00:57:36,360 --> 00:57:49,020
wolfgang wieland: And on the boundary you just do exactly the same you just multiply the you just add is complex value coupling constant in front of your boundary action.

349
00:57:50,490 --> 00:57:55,110
wolfgang wieland: And the only book now happens is that.

350
00:57:56,430 --> 00:58:09,630
wolfgang wieland: This one form that you need to add, in order to make that the boundary term involvement on the order or Kabbalah and under and the locations now changes its.

351
00:58:10,380 --> 00:58:24,780
wolfgang wieland: Its meaning or its changes its geometric significance, the boundary conditions of formerly the same However, their definition of these equivalents relation this equivalence class is now.

352
00:58:26,400 --> 00:58:33,810
wolfgang wieland: changed or affected by the introduction of of the mercy, what do you find in fact is that.

353
00:58:34,950 --> 00:58:49,470
wolfgang wieland: Is one form CAFE is now the you want analog of the Su to Africa avail connection in fact it's time or it's not a component is a combination of.

354
00:58:50,580 --> 00:58:55,920
wolfgang wieland: The Non affinity of united direction plus one upon gamma.

355
00:58:57,000 --> 00:58:59,820
wolfgang wieland: available in mercy parameter times.

356
00:59:01,710 --> 00:59:07,860
wolfgang wieland: against potential, which is the you want, on a lot of the spin connection so can be.

357
00:59:09,360 --> 00:59:15,750
wolfgang wieland: obtained from the derivative of your knowledge like long the non directions and what do you then.

358
00:59:16,770 --> 00:59:37,770
wolfgang wieland: have to do is that or what do you then find this that this one from CAFE behaves as a connection both thunder Bay locations and you want gates transformations, and that makes it them know surface on a log of that is Jacob ever connection.

359
00:59:38,850 --> 00:59:43,710
wolfgang wieland: And I will expand more on that on in in the future.

360
00:59:45,270 --> 00:59:47,550
wolfgang wieland: So the very near future.

361
00:59:48,600 --> 00:59:49,530
should be out soon.

362
00:59:51,030 --> 01:00:13,650
wolfgang wieland: And this also relates, I mean this is, I just edit to make a bit to make a bit relation to this reason papers of law and amelia mouth more explicit where etc plays a major role now so far is the group of.

363
01:00:15,660 --> 01:00:16,620
wolfgang wieland: Preserving.

364
01:00:17,760 --> 01:00:23,430
wolfgang wieland: linear transformations in two dimensions and how.

365
01:00:25,500 --> 01:00:35,520
wolfgang wieland: How how and the relation to their faith based variables that i've introduced on the last last couple of slides is very easy, in fact.

366
01:00:36,540 --> 01:00:54,390
wolfgang wieland: Out of the sheer and this you want connection, you can just construct and SL to our, so to speak, alone me alone denial generators where these generators satisfy the standard as into our conversation relations.

367
01:00:58,080 --> 01:00:58,470
wolfgang wieland: But.

368
01:00:59,910 --> 01:01:12,840
wolfgang wieland: That is kind of a excursion to the future, I should also finish what I told told you about the pace pace.

369
01:01:14,130 --> 01:01:15,510
wolfgang wieland: So so far i've only.

370
01:01:17,460 --> 01:01:37,470
wolfgang wieland: So let us briefly recap, so I introduced this debris in our affiliation, then I specified the bark corresponding the action but also specified the boundary conditions now what is missing is to derive from all that the faceplates and now.

371
01:01:39,420 --> 01:01:46,350
wolfgang wieland: Yes, so at that point we're still in the covariance faceplates approach, so we only introduce.

372
01:01:48,960 --> 01:02:00,210
wolfgang wieland: Some galactic potentials on an on field space, this does not get so depressed and galactic potential Peter an on field space, this does not yet define the facebook's.

373
01:02:01,560 --> 01:02:03,240
wolfgang wieland: However, it defines.

374
01:02:06,690 --> 01:02:09,450
wolfgang wieland: The starting point from which we can construct the face.

375
01:02:10,770 --> 01:02:17,940
wolfgang wieland: On the not hyper surface we get this expression which contains sheer and expansion now, since we know.

376
01:02:19,500 --> 01:02:27,990
wolfgang wieland: Since I have now introduced this topic in our affiliation, I can take the limit to infinity so where this remember this red.

377
01:02:29,310 --> 01:02:45,360
wolfgang wieland: Top navigation and now I can just take this given volume to infinity and evaluate the syntactic structure and what you then obtain is indeed just the usual.

378
01:02:46,980 --> 01:02:47,850
wolfgang wieland: radiative.

379
01:02:49,200 --> 01:02:55,440
wolfgang wieland: pace pace as as as it was introduced by by.

380
01:02:57,270 --> 01:03:05,970
wolfgang wieland: Many years ago, and this is very nice, because it is, it is a consistency check it tells you that.

381
01:03:07,170 --> 01:03:08,010
wolfgang wieland: From this.

382
01:03:09,120 --> 01:03:11,160
wolfgang wieland: domino affiliation, you can.

383
01:03:12,480 --> 01:03:20,040
wolfgang wieland: recover the face face value infinity in the same way, you can also go to a different types of.

384
01:03:21,090 --> 01:03:31,890
wolfgang wieland: insight and the manifold, namely an isolated horizon for instance where the sheer vanishes and so does the expansion so you're just left with.

385
01:03:33,720 --> 01:03:40,860
wolfgang wieland: With with this term, which is tenders electric potential and has been introduced for an isolated wise.

386
01:03:44,820 --> 01:04:03,030
wolfgang wieland: But now, since then, this tabernacle affiliation or these regions that i've chosen split into have different kind of boundaries, we also mainly space like and and now we also have a subjective potential for the NRA.

387
01:04:04,410 --> 01:04:12,990
wolfgang wieland: For the space like hyper surfaces, which consists of the user shirt but turning the bikes to tell us that the Africa connection.

388
01:04:14,160 --> 01:04:32,580
wolfgang wieland: The sexual connection at the present like to collaborate is canonical conjugate to the flux, but this is now, this is now gets an additional corner term that tells us that the spinner valued fields are Comically conjugate.

389
01:04:33,630 --> 01:04:38,430
wolfgang wieland: And let me skip this slide and I will conclude here.

390
01:04:40,440 --> 01:04:55,140
wolfgang wieland: Because now i'm going back to the original form, now i'm asking is there me he said how many tonia on that face space for vector field that last tangential to this to this generates.

391
01:04:57,600 --> 01:05:02,640
wolfgang wieland: And if now delta is variation on field spits.

392
01:05:03,660 --> 01:05:05,250
wolfgang wieland: So, again on this.

393
01:05:06,450 --> 01:05:20,460
wolfgang wieland: The at the level of this equation, we are not yet speaking about base base, this is an equation, that is true, on the fee on on combined face bits.

394
01:05:21,300 --> 01:05:32,250
wolfgang wieland: Which is larger than it is not truly have a space, yet, because it has the general directions and there's and we don't really distinguish boundary fields, from.

395
01:05:32,760 --> 01:05:43,140
wolfgang wieland: Faith based variables, what do you then find is that on that face based on that space, the following equation is satisfied, namely the.

396
01:05:43,980 --> 01:06:00,660
wolfgang wieland: The exists hamiltonian which is integral theory, if you add this additional corner term, which is the contraction of the nars simplistic current with the normal vector field evaluated against these people.

397
01:06:02,130 --> 01:06:17,250
wolfgang wieland: And the point that I like to make is that this equation is is the analogy of what I have introduced earlier, the simple time model, where we have.

398
01:06:18,510 --> 01:06:20,580
wolfgang wieland: There were the hemi where the.

399
01:06:21,870 --> 01:06:29,790
wolfgang wieland: The variation delta is not a tangent based on pace pace, but attention vector that.

400
01:06:31,110 --> 01:06:54,150
wolfgang wieland: contains also variations of the spectrum fields and, in other words the hamiltonian depends not only on bass bass very rigorous and its dependence is encoded by simplistic potential contracted with the time direction, but it also contains a functional dependence on this.

401
01:06:56,400 --> 01:07:21,690
wolfgang wieland: Additional background fields that drives the time evolution, the time dependence of the hamiltonian and if Delta, is it saves and govt, then the only term that survives is is this last term it drives the time dependence of the hamiltonian and the same is true at the level of.

402
01:07:23,760 --> 01:07:28,560
wolfgang wieland: This at the theoretical level if in fact delta is itself.

403
01:07:29,850 --> 01:07:30,150
wolfgang wieland: In.

404
01:07:31,170 --> 01:07:32,280
wolfgang wieland: Parallel to.

405
01:07:33,960 --> 01:07:50,400
wolfgang wieland: Is the Leader rooted in the direction of sight, then the electric term vanishes the second term just gives you the flux, which determines the time dependence of the of the hamiltonian and which is always positive.

406
01:07:51,480 --> 01:07:58,140
wolfgang wieland: And what I have included here in this last line is.

407
01:07:59,250 --> 01:08:02,190
wolfgang wieland: To to explain what is the.

408
01:08:03,660 --> 01:08:05,400
wolfgang wieland: Physical significance of this coming.

409
01:08:06,420 --> 01:08:11,700
wolfgang wieland: In fact, it is not directly the mass as measured by on the energy.

410
01:08:12,990 --> 01:08:19,320
wolfgang wieland: But the difference differs from the bondi energy by a term that is the area.

411
01:08:21,270 --> 01:08:25,620
wolfgang wieland: multiplied with the non affinity of this direction, I think.

412
01:08:26,730 --> 01:08:30,330
wolfgang wieland: And just one more.

413
01:08:32,100 --> 01:08:34,590
wolfgang wieland: comment in evaluating this term.

414
01:08:35,730 --> 01:08:47,850
wolfgang wieland: You have to take a limit to infinity are very close to infinity and it first, you may 1 get the impression that this term verges However, the divergence is.

415
01:08:49,110 --> 01:08:59,610
wolfgang wieland: If so, if you go all the way back to the fall of conditions of spin coefficients, then the divergence is governed by that term.

416
01:09:00,540 --> 01:09:18,540
wolfgang wieland: I haven't told you what our is our is the pitches katie a two dimensional which is kayla of these two dimensional cross sections, and if you integrate, which is 10 integrated against the volume volume to form the area element on these four sections.

417
01:09:19,980 --> 01:09:22,170
wolfgang wieland: And this is a topological invariant.

418
01:09:23,580 --> 01:09:26,730
wolfgang wieland: Namely the La la la stick.

419
01:09:27,840 --> 01:09:28,470
wolfgang wieland: Was.

420
01:09:30,750 --> 01:09:37,530
wolfgang wieland: Bernie and who's variation because in this equation only teletype us.

421
01:09:38,790 --> 01:09:49,020
wolfgang wieland: is constant because it's a topological environment so, in other words, this term contain this equation contains a term that is.

422
01:09:51,480 --> 01:10:05,460
wolfgang wieland: It looks as if it is that appears to be ub I are divergent linear in our However, the term is evaluated against the variation of a topological variant.

423
01:10:07,200 --> 01:10:11,910
wolfgang wieland: vanishes because is the variation of a number of initiatives.

424
01:10:13,170 --> 01:10:13,560
and

425
01:10:14,880 --> 01:10:25,380
wolfgang wieland: So that's a kind of a technical remote call this limit or what has to be taken into account to evaluate these limits and.

426
01:10:27,630 --> 01:10:30,180
wolfgang wieland: So let me conclude, maybe here.

427
01:10:31,470 --> 01:10:32,970
wolfgang wieland: That question is.

428
01:10:34,980 --> 01:10:37,950
wolfgang wieland: A question that has appeared in the literature mateys.

429
01:10:39,090 --> 01:10:44,910
wolfgang wieland: Easter hamiltonian on spy plastic bring that drives evolution along this.

430
01:10:45,990 --> 01:10:49,740
wolfgang wieland: Long this non hyper surface and.

431
01:10:51,990 --> 01:10:54,960
wolfgang wieland: What I would like to say is this is.

432
01:10:56,400 --> 01:11:05,760
wolfgang wieland: Such a hamiltonian exist if you make certain assumptions, or if you feel restrict yourself to a.

433
01:11:06,930 --> 01:11:25,890
wolfgang wieland: to certain to certain floor Leah or certain services in coburn face space, namely those were the outgoing flux is is fixed or treated differently, not as a as part of a space for treated as a.

434
01:11:27,240 --> 01:11:27,540
wolfgang wieland: field.

435
01:11:28,740 --> 01:11:29,190
and

436
01:11:31,710 --> 01:11:32,460
and

437
01:11:34,350 --> 01:11:36,000
And I think I can continue.

438
01:11:37,290 --> 01:11:37,650
Thank you.

439
01:11:46,170 --> 01:11:47,070
Jorge Pullin: But any questions.

440
01:11:50,940 --> 01:11:58,920
Jonathan Engle: I have one question so you're treating the boundary variables like background fields, as you just emphasize again.

441
01:12:00,480 --> 01:12:05,820
Jonathan Engle: But you said, with some collective structure for them, which really you would have for a face space so i'm wondering.

442
01:12:06,210 --> 01:12:07,170
wolfgang wieland: yeah yeah yeah.

443
01:12:07,260 --> 01:12:08,040
Jonathan Engle: I know that.

444
01:12:11,100 --> 01:12:17,550
wolfgang wieland: I read that this may be a bit confusing, but again, this is.

445
01:12:19,800 --> 01:12:25,230
wolfgang wieland: This decent decent now choices, you can make or choices that we can make, so we can say.

446
01:12:26,310 --> 01:12:47,160
wolfgang wieland: I want to go to a face space where I treat their radiative data as as a faceplates Okay, you can do that, and then you have to, then I have to give you a simplistic structure and it's what i've written in that line, but you can also have a different viewpoint.

447
01:12:48,360 --> 01:12:58,620
wolfgang wieland: And, which is equally legitimate, you can ask is there hamiltonian That brings me from one cross section to the next forgiven products.

448
01:13:00,300 --> 01:13:15,240
wolfgang wieland: Now that is a different, this is also hamiltonian Christian but it operates on a different Facebook and now you have to ask what is the simplistic structure that you find on that face order that you.

449
01:13:17,940 --> 01:13:39,720
wolfgang wieland: That you have to choose for that face face and it's given it will be good given on on that line where you now have to constrain that face space, so you have to evaluate this syntactic structure for only those configurations that are compatible, without going flux.

450
01:13:41,130 --> 01:13:51,720
wolfgang wieland: And then I would say, then, then there is still a hamiltonian that generates this evolution and it's given by this this.

451
01:13:53,910 --> 01:14:00,630
wolfgang wieland: This formula and, indeed, your question is precisely at the is the crucial point and.

452
01:14:01,830 --> 01:14:15,270
wolfgang wieland: But i'm not trying to say one viewpoint is the correct one and the other one should be disregarded what i'm trying to say is that there are different choices and different ways to look at.

453
01:14:16,470 --> 01:14:21,750
wolfgang wieland: At at at the system from a hamiltonian perspective and.

454
01:14:23,370 --> 01:14:23,850
wolfgang wieland: and

455
01:14:25,740 --> 01:14:26,130
That.

456
01:14:28,260 --> 01:14:36,300
wolfgang wieland: And perhaps for each of them days there's a there's a quantum perspective, you know and.

457
01:14:37,410 --> 01:14:39,240
wolfgang wieland: And I think that is a very.

458
01:14:41,040 --> 01:14:44,460
wolfgang wieland: yeah that's a very interesting PCT question, you can ask what is the.

459
01:14:45,540 --> 01:14:59,070
wolfgang wieland: What is the evolution from one cross section to the next, even the outgoing cheer and Easter Easter the quantum theory associated to these questions, normally we ask.

460
01:15:00,840 --> 01:15:14,280
wolfgang wieland: We think of it in a nice matrix big picture, what is the problem, given some in going radiation here given some outgoing radiation there, what is the probability to go from here to there.

461
01:15:14,790 --> 01:15:22,260
wolfgang wieland: But then you have so you can also ask different questions, we can perhaps we can ask questions of the following, so what is.

462
01:15:22,920 --> 01:15:42,330
wolfgang wieland: Given a boundary State on a cross section here in the foundry straight stayed on a cross section there, what is the probability to grow from one cross section to the next, even the outgoing flux and I think that is also an interesting question and privacy this question that can be answered.

463
01:15:43,440 --> 01:15:46,800
wolfgang wieland: directly, then the one which is about estimate.

464
01:15:49,500 --> 01:15:59,400
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: But so let's take your second point of view, which is to say that you're fixing the radiative degrees of freedom on the boundary, so there is not so that then drops out of the synthetic structure is that right or not.

465
01:16:00,450 --> 01:16:00,840
wolfgang wieland: Yes.

466
01:16:01,410 --> 01:16:10,950
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Okay, so, then that way but he's got to say that anyway, the hamiltonian there is a lot of freedom to add, I mean anything which is constant.

467
01:16:12,540 --> 01:16:25,260
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Hamilton is determine all you have to constant I mean it's something we just constantly but then, why can't I just say that the how do I know that the the right answer is exactly the bondi mean, why is it not.

468
01:16:26,850 --> 01:16:27,510
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: want them.

469
01:16:27,840 --> 01:16:30,840
wolfgang wieland: Right, because any functional Sigma say.

470
01:16:30,990 --> 01:16:33,030
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: yeah for any any function i'm sick right.

471
01:16:34,050 --> 01:16:37,920
wolfgang wieland: Yes, that is yeah, that is true that kind of.

472
01:16:38,010 --> 01:16:47,310
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So, so that I mean so that is a key point that you did not emphasize that this procedure will not tell you what the value of damage, because you wrote down hamiltonian something for something right.

473
01:16:49,980 --> 01:16:57,600
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Before that you wrote down the formula we said that the hamiltonian was equal to the bondi plus some book or something like that.

474
01:16:57,900 --> 01:16:59,100
wolfgang wieland: Yes, that's right.

475
01:17:00,180 --> 01:17:09,540
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: But then I mean Hamilton is unusual, I think that is a key point here I mean this undetermined up because it can be any function of Sigma.

476
01:17:12,000 --> 01:17:12,600
wolfgang wieland: Any.

477
01:17:15,090 --> 01:17:17,640
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: I mean, I can add to your answer any function of Sigma.

478
01:17:20,400 --> 01:17:21,150
wolfgang wieland: Yes.

479
01:17:22,740 --> 01:17:27,780
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: But isn't that doesn't add value in that it doesn't have much of a significant right, I mean I could.

480
01:17:30,150 --> 01:17:37,470
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: I could choose to say that the hamiltonian is just the corresponds to the 01 the flax or zero body energy.

481
01:17:41,490 --> 01:17:42,840
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: I mean the body energy doesn't change.

482
01:17:44,400 --> 01:17:49,410
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: I can make it that happen by by just choices deposits yeah.

483
01:17:52,740 --> 01:17:56,340
wolfgang wieland: Yes, that is a fair remark, however.

484
01:17:58,200 --> 01:18:00,420
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: i've been the user yeah.

485
01:18:01,620 --> 01:18:03,810
wolfgang wieland: No, but what I would say that.

486
01:18:04,830 --> 01:18:10,320
wolfgang wieland: it's a necessary condition that you get what I what I.

487
01:18:11,490 --> 01:18:12,450
wolfgang wieland: What I wrote down.

488
01:18:13,080 --> 01:18:26,160
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: I get it so thought up to that item vicki i'm fine with you, but I think that the key point next but, most people would be to know what is a Monday, energy or what is a body flux and in New York er.

489
01:18:27,210 --> 01:18:31,170
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Actually, the body FLEX I mean the difference between the between the.

490
01:18:32,820 --> 01:18:42,150
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: body mass of two different cross sections and according to you, apart from the dimensional consideration, it can be any function of Sigma.

491
01:18:43,110 --> 01:18:44,640
wolfgang wieland: When I would say that.

492
01:18:46,080 --> 01:18:46,380
wolfgang wieland: That.

493
01:18:48,330 --> 01:19:00,480
wolfgang wieland: So I I presented this in the answer to to the previous question, I presented these two viewpoints is to face basis that we can speak.

494
01:19:00,630 --> 01:19:04,200
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: No, but I want to take this you're saying that there are two viewpoints, am I can take the either.

495
01:19:04,500 --> 01:19:05,160
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: And I didn't.

496
01:19:06,270 --> 01:19:08,100
wolfgang wieland: know I thought I want to say is that.

497
01:19:09,690 --> 01:19:22,410
wolfgang wieland: automatically there must be a relation and I think this will this I mean the dance is not very great, but I think that that the relation will provide that.

498
01:19:26,040 --> 01:19:37,800
wolfgang wieland: will make only one choice of the the hamiltonian work, in other words, you want to what what is, what do you say me Tony and in the one what is tammy Tony in one.

499
01:19:39,390 --> 01:19:49,980
wolfgang wieland: viewpoint it comes flux, or the difference between two hamiltonian narrow viewpoint, so there should be a relation that them.

500
01:19:52,170 --> 01:20:02,190
wolfgang wieland: yeah the difference between two hamiltonian is then we realized as the as the bondi flux in our viewpoint.

501
01:20:03,840 --> 01:20:10,560
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So you brought the what you call the first somebody else wants to ask a question I, this is a continuation of the same point so in this finished.

502
01:20:11,910 --> 01:20:23,790
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: In broad terms what you call the first viewpoint, in which the boundary degrees of freedom are not fixed his besides my viewpoint that were taken a long time ago and I do this with this point paper with the.

503
01:20:25,110 --> 01:20:26,310
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Royal line belly.

504
01:20:27,360 --> 01:20:29,670
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: And then we got the usual bonnie formula.

505
01:20:32,610 --> 01:20:33,060
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: But then.

506
01:20:34,140 --> 01:20:37,080
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: i'm kinda answer, or what am I learning by taking the second point of view.

507
01:20:38,610 --> 01:20:45,750
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: We know the answers we know everything, so what am I learning by saying that well I could also consider another face space and with a boundary Dickies of.

508
01:20:46,770 --> 01:20:50,730
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: frozen what new information, am I getting from that second viewpoint.

509
01:20:54,120 --> 01:20:56,220
wolfgang wieland: I think what do you get is.

510
01:20:59,250 --> 01:21:21,270
wolfgang wieland: Any and and you have a new perspective on what for holography can do and can not do so, I would say hello, or if he cannot characterized radiative or cannot capture the radiative degrees of freedom, it is a theory only of these today is called I mentioned to.

511
01:21:23,280 --> 01:21:26,070
wolfgang wieland: edge degrees of freedom and.

512
01:21:26,550 --> 01:21:27,450
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Maybe that you just.

513
01:21:28,680 --> 01:21:40,620
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: keep on you should have emphasized right I this I agree with, so that one could just say that well door point up here is just that right that holographic cannot do that and then.

514
01:21:42,630 --> 01:21:50,730
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: And then you know the other things are consistency checks, namely that one can go from one viewpoint on other and as you're saying, but consistency, then you would get the.

515
01:21:51,210 --> 01:22:00,450
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: usual answers but holographic cannot do this is the main point right and because everything else will not be for the first few pointers known before it is a second view point that you are introducing new.

516
01:22:01,710 --> 01:22:04,380
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Am I right about that, I mean, do you agree with this or not that's my.

517
01:22:07,290 --> 01:22:09,630
wolfgang wieland: i'm a bit confused by this person second.

518
01:22:10,350 --> 01:22:10,650
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Okay.

519
01:22:10,770 --> 01:22:12,660
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: The first view point is the one in which you do not.

520
01:22:13,110 --> 01:22:14,340
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: freeze the degrees of freedom.

521
01:22:15,930 --> 01:22:19,200
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: And therefore, you get the body form for the FLEX formulate the usual way.

522
01:22:19,890 --> 01:22:37,230
wolfgang wieland: Well Okay, I would add that to that perhaps the only thing I can add is to understand how how to go from requires a local pace pace for radiative mode to the one that is defined as acknowledge infinity.

523
01:22:40,050 --> 01:22:42,960
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So in this perspective if you go back to your slide number.

524
01:22:43,080 --> 01:22:45,060
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Well slide number 25.

525
01:22:49,980 --> 01:22:50,280
wolfgang wieland: Yes.

526
01:22:51,150 --> 01:22:59,580
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So, so this is kind of encapsulating what you're saying right, this is the local thing that you're looking at and you're going to influence yeah but.

527
01:23:00,450 --> 01:23:07,320
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: This just for clarification i'm not on because I just want to make sure I didn't miss anything but isn't this The thing that we sort of were talking about.

528
01:23:07,650 --> 01:23:16,620
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: With the ceremony, and like 3040 years ago Okay, so this is the same as that and going to the going from the finite boundaries in an eternity that part is the same.

529
01:23:17,640 --> 01:23:25,980
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Yes, is that OK, and the last thing was on page 21.

530
01:23:28,410 --> 01:23:31,890
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So he is this correct gamma plus I upon gamma or is it.

531
01:23:33,960 --> 01:23:34,800
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Because if I put.

532
01:23:35,550 --> 01:23:36,090
wolfgang wieland: yeah it is.

533
01:23:38,970 --> 01:23:41,790
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So gamma equal to is supposed to give you the.

534
01:23:42,360 --> 01:23:44,370
wolfgang wieland: Oh coming to my well.

535
01:23:46,050 --> 01:23:48,120
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Like must be i'd because otherwise it'll just go away.

536
01:23:50,130 --> 01:23:52,680
wolfgang wieland: Well, it is a convention better the whole tour.

537
01:23:53,700 --> 01:23:59,070
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: or whatever you want, but I mean again I go to mind the side, and then the actual zero and you don't want that easily.

538
01:24:01,170 --> 01:24:05,820
wolfgang wieland: yeah so coming into a so you're saying that today is a plus or minus.

539
01:24:06,330 --> 01:24:10,050
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: No yeah and also actually should be the other way around, I mean.

540
01:24:11,670 --> 01:24:14,850
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: To be one upon gamma gamma.

541
01:24:17,040 --> 01:24:20,100
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: gamma gamma plus I mean this is.

542
01:24:20,160 --> 01:24:20,340
What.

543
01:24:21,780 --> 01:24:22,260
wolfgang wieland: You see.

544
01:24:23,340 --> 01:24:23,760
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: yeah.

545
01:24:24,210 --> 01:24:24,900
So.

546
01:24:26,370 --> 01:24:39,180
wolfgang wieland: Okay, so in a way to to to see what's going on here is princeton's take the limit comma to infinity, then the second term goes away he's terms of ice.

547
01:24:40,050 --> 01:25:00,630
wolfgang wieland: This it becomes intense or notation just a hot store, so this becomes staff even he contracted with that, so this the cutting edge and the other one is just the one where you the horse term where you replace the old student with just identity.

548
01:25:01,110 --> 01:25:01,380
Okay.

549
01:25:03,030 --> 01:25:18,990
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Okay, but my belief is that it will gamma divided by one plus gamma pi not because of what we not want is one of 116 pages in the denominator and not for page but let's forget about that, on this is totally irrelevant.

550
01:25:22,440 --> 01:25:22,920
Jorge Pullin: tomorrow.

551
01:25:24,600 --> 01:25:25,260
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Seven days yeah.

552
01:25:25,860 --> 01:25:26,520
Simone SPEZIALE: I think you.

553
01:25:27,600 --> 01:25:36,870
Simone SPEZIALE: Just do a quick questions and what about the beach 28 when you will give you a prescription for the indigo beauty of them etonian I was wondering if.

554
01:25:37,440 --> 01:25:44,490
Simone SPEZIALE: They can be the Omega term usually can be split into something that is the delta out something plus.

555
01:25:45,270 --> 01:25:59,220
Simone SPEZIALE: The XI of tea the right so i'm wondering whether your prescription effectively amounts to eliminating is it that term that is already in capital Omega or there is some part of that there remains.

556
01:26:01,440 --> 01:26:08,610
wolfgang wieland: yeah I haven't thought about it in that way, because in here, so this.

557
01:26:11,070 --> 01:26:22,020
wolfgang wieland: So Omega Sigma is obtained from this inflected current on Sigma while this guy is this electric current on the non hyper surface.

558
01:26:22,470 --> 01:26:28,350
Simone SPEZIALE: Which and they might have a discontinuity when you pull them back, both at the corner, but.

559
01:26:29,070 --> 01:26:30,330
yeah okay.

560
01:26:32,610 --> 01:26:38,550
Simone SPEZIALE: And the second question, I had to maybe sort of talks also with this discussion that has been going on.

561
01:26:39,390 --> 01:26:50,850
Simone SPEZIALE: i'm not writing right, could you when we think of what is in our perspective, one, so the fuller face base associated with scribe the geometric variables that the parameters this face piece or the shears.

562
01:26:51,330 --> 01:27:04,560
Simone SPEZIALE: But when you think you just in terms of what you've been referring to as edge mode, so they they just the to the data can you give us a geometric characterization of what they are probably did, but can you just repeat it.

563
01:27:06,510 --> 01:27:08,730
wolfgang wieland: While they're there Mozart did.

564
01:27:09,840 --> 01:27:10,680
These guys.

565
01:27:11,820 --> 01:27:15,630
Simone SPEZIALE: But I can you give us a Java, the characterization of what these variables describe.

566
01:27:17,250 --> 01:27:25,230
wolfgang wieland: So they are described them as they come former factor, and I said to our SL to see frame.

567
01:27:27,480 --> 01:27:39,420
Simone SPEZIALE: Okay, so the to the metric is basically they they degrees of freedom mother describe your reduce the face pace in these second viewpoint uh huh Okay, thank you.

568
01:27:42,750 --> 01:27:48,000
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: One minute and I thought that that extra information or site to not maybe that's what.

569
01:27:51,240 --> 01:27:51,570
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: It is.

570
01:27:53,280 --> 01:27:54,930
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: it's not related at all.

571
01:27:56,220 --> 01:28:01,830
wolfgang wieland: today's no that's right sorry, there is no part in here that would correspond to say.

572
01:28:02,880 --> 01:28:05,970
wolfgang wieland: These old spin coefficients not courageous.

573
01:28:11,220 --> 01:28:14,010
Simone SPEZIALE: And he gives up here of these pink efficient.

574
01:28:14,190 --> 01:28:15,810
Where they could produce okay.

575
01:28:19,980 --> 01:28:20,460
Simone SPEZIALE: Thank you any.

576
01:28:22,770 --> 01:28:23,520
Jorge Pullin: Other questions.

577
01:28:26,040 --> 01:28:26,220
wolfgang wieland: You.

578
01:28:28,410 --> 01:28:30,930
wolfgang wieland: Know similar maybe.

579
01:28:32,010 --> 01:28:34,050
Simone SPEZIALE: Perhaps actually because.

580
01:28:34,440 --> 01:28:35,910
If you think of.

581
01:28:37,230 --> 01:28:38,310
i'm.

582
01:28:41,130 --> 01:28:41,520
wolfgang wieland: Sorry.

583
01:28:41,550 --> 01:28:44,070
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: The fall of can say what What do you mean by perhaps.

584
01:28:45,900 --> 01:28:49,440
wolfgang wieland: You Okay, excuse me so someone was asking if.

585
01:28:50,880 --> 01:28:53,820
wolfgang wieland: If side two shows up in some collective potential.

586
01:28:55,530 --> 01:28:57,450
Simone SPEZIALE: By yours, but then.

587
01:28:58,560 --> 01:28:58,890
wolfgang wieland: When.

588
01:29:00,150 --> 01:29:01,590
wolfgang wieland: The way it.

589
01:29:02,880 --> 01:29:03,120
Is.

590
01:29:04,590 --> 01:29:12,000
wolfgang wieland: I think it shows up in tita but then goes away, if I remember correctly, it goes away by.

591
01:29:18,510 --> 01:29:19,920
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: They don't show it.

592
01:29:20,070 --> 01:29:22,200
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: really does show in the top, one of the two.

593
01:29:23,040 --> 01:29:35,460
wolfgang wieland: Exactly chose hopping Peta, but it appears in there is totally rewritten for something so that it falls out of the when we compute Omega at the simplistic to form.

594
01:29:37,380 --> 01:29:41,790
wolfgang wieland: So side to a piece, because it appears in the fall of for the.

595
01:29:43,020 --> 01:29:44,970
wolfgang wieland: Non affinity or Cup.

596
01:29:47,730 --> 01:30:01,140
Simone SPEZIALE: As a total derivative in space or a total derivative infield spaces, so you just make sure you feel space yeah so maybe it could be preserved, if one and large the face space in some appropriate way, yes.

597
01:30:02,700 --> 01:30:05,040
Simone SPEZIALE: which could be interesting yeah.

598
01:30:05,850 --> 01:30:10,050
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: But in this case, are you keeping side to fix them on the face space, I mean like right.

599
01:30:11,580 --> 01:30:18,930
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: which we point in any other two viewpoints are we keeping this fixed on the face face or you do not have to worry about it.

600
01:30:21,060 --> 01:30:29,460
wolfgang wieland: um well, I did not worry about it, because it appears as a total derivative in in in face face.

601
01:30:30,840 --> 01:30:39,660
wolfgang wieland: On field space on me, so there is a delta side to it just goes goes away, of course, then the question is, what is its role on.

602
01:30:40,740 --> 01:30:43,200
wolfgang wieland: That that survives this question, what is it.

603
01:30:44,070 --> 01:30:49,800
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: yeah so again, is the usual thing that I have been told, is just we don't deploy constant yeah yeah.

604
01:30:51,690 --> 01:31:06,750
Simone SPEZIALE: you're not fixing the area to form right, so how can it appear as just confused now how can it appear as a total variation infield space, are you interested when you define it as integral of these scupper what is happening there, that makes it.

605
01:31:07,200 --> 01:31:08,160
wolfgang wieland: happen so.

606
01:31:09,120 --> 01:31:15,300
Simone SPEZIALE: You may request, so I think, because your ear to form is not so.

607
01:31:17,640 --> 01:31:42,240
wolfgang wieland: Thank you so Kappa shows up here, actually, you can see it in here so Kappa this goes like side to over on Oscar but epsilon goes like R squared so the two constantly charter, provided it variations of the area to form for off faster than.

608
01:31:43,500 --> 01:31:44,130
Oscar.

609
01:31:46,350 --> 01:31:55,770
Simone SPEZIALE: I guess that's, the key point so in your court so to go back to your question, the corner variables that you're describing that span of his face piece and you're allowed to very.

610
01:31:56,310 --> 01:32:04,710
Simone SPEZIALE: Are there, let me sharpen my question are there, the leading order of the variation of data to form or the sub leading.

611
01:32:06,540 --> 01:32:12,990
Simone SPEZIALE: Like are you fixing a bond, in other words, are you keeping up on the frame fixed, are you allowing varying bondi frames, to be part of your face space.

612
01:32:14,430 --> 01:32:16,230
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: I think it's getting it fixed to Bali.

613
01:32:16,350 --> 01:32:20,580
Simone SPEZIALE: Bali famous Okay, then it will make sense okay yeah doesn't even make sense upside to the.

614
01:32:20,670 --> 01:32:24,450
Simone SPEZIALE: South and the correct the largest one could bring it back.

615
01:32:25,920 --> 01:32:26,160
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Right.

616
01:32:28,950 --> 01:32:30,840
Jorge Pullin: Okay, mark you had a question.

617
01:32:33,870 --> 01:32:36,360
Marc Geiller: it's I think it's Okay, I can ask it privately maybe.

618
01:32:36,600 --> 01:32:39,360
Jorge Pullin: There is a question in the chat as well.

619
01:32:42,990 --> 01:33:00,180
Jorge Pullin: So hallway dang says, I want to ask a question, are you considering, are you considering the synthetic space time here, I know, synthetic flat space time the super translation charges are the bondi mass can you model recover this result, or you recovered it already.

620
01:33:02,160 --> 01:33:05,460
wolfgang wieland: yeah so the point is that.

621
01:33:08,880 --> 01:33:11,460
wolfgang wieland: In here, so the hamiltonian.

622
01:33:12,540 --> 01:33:15,270
wolfgang wieland: I get when calculating this.

623
01:33:17,040 --> 01:33:18,870
wolfgang wieland: By integrating this equation.

624
01:33:19,980 --> 01:33:22,440
Is is given by this line.

625
01:33:23,490 --> 01:33:28,440
wolfgang wieland: So it is the body mass corrected by something that looks like.

626
01:33:31,560 --> 01:33:33,000
When interviewed times.

627
01:33:34,710 --> 01:33:36,810
wolfgang wieland: amperage so it's like a.

628
01:33:38,070 --> 01:33:41,490
wolfgang wieland: relation between the body mass and hamiltonian is.

629
01:33:42,630 --> 01:33:43,260
wolfgang wieland: governed by.

630
01:33:44,550 --> 01:33:47,040
wolfgang wieland: genre transform into a space.

631
01:33:48,120 --> 01:33:49,140
wolfgang wieland: So it's like different.

632
01:33:50,790 --> 01:33:51,870
wolfgang wieland: attentions on.

633
01:33:54,270 --> 01:33:56,700
wolfgang wieland: Different that thermodynamic potential in some cases.

634
01:33:59,370 --> 01:34:04,140
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: So I think the answer is that, although the transpose it doesn't show explicitly.

635
01:34:04,560 --> 01:34:11,580
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Because transparency only talks about bond the energy and not about bond is super momentum and the question was about bond discipline momentum in some ways.

636
01:34:12,420 --> 01:34:25,980
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: But the answer is that bondage for momentum can also be obtained this framework if you're an adult the first viewpoint, for the second viewpoint, the hamiltonian is defined only up to constant and then one does not know.

637
01:34:27,720 --> 01:34:38,910
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: Unless one brings in the first few point for consistency than one would not know what the value of the body, energy or bondi super momentum is but from the first viewpoint, the bondi.

638
01:34:41,100 --> 01:34:43,650
Abhay Vasant Ashtekar: sober momentum is actually recovered in this work.

639
01:34:46,740 --> 01:34:48,540
wolfgang wieland: yeah I think that's fair.

640
01:34:53,850 --> 01:34:54,870
Jorge Pullin: Any other questions.

641
01:35:01,230 --> 01:35:01,470
Okay.

642
01:35:05,100 --> 01:35:05,490
Thank you.